RAMESH S,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CIRCLE 7(1), CHENNAI
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the
Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in
short ‘the Ld.CIT(A)’), Delhi, dated 01.03.2024 for the Assessment Year
(hereinafter in short ‘AY’) 2009-10.
The main grievance of the assessee is that the Ld.CIT(A) has
passed an ex parte order without going into the merits of the case.
According to the Ld.AR, the Ld.CIT(A) was of the opinion that there was a
ITA No.1044/Chny/2024 (AY 2009-10) S. Ramesh :: 2 ::
delay in filing of the appeal i.e. more than 2802 days (i.e. more than ‘7’
years) and since assessee didn’t file any condonation petition, he didn’t
condone the delay and dismissed the appeal. In this regard, according to
him, the Ld.CIT(A) noted that the assessee has acknowledged in Form 35
that there was a delay in filing of the appeal; and the reason for delay
was stated therein that the business as well as tax related issues were
handled by his late father and the assessee was not aware of the
assessment order passed in AY 2009-10 in this case. According to the
assessee, since his father passed away he was under depression and was
under medical treatment and only when he received the notice from the
Tax Recovery Officer in December, 2022 that he came to know about the
assessment order dated 10.03.2015; and immediately thereafter, had
filed the appeal on 09.01.2023 (20 days). According to the assessee, he
wouldn’t gain by not filing the appeal, when there was an addition of
Rs.35,31,535/-. Therefore, for the ends of justice and fair play, he prays
that the delay may be condoned and matter be restored to the file of the
Ld.CIT(A) for adjudication in accordance to law.
Per contra, the Ld.DR does not want us to give one more
opportunity to the assessee, because, the assessee didn’t file appeal for
very long time (7 years) and since, he also participated in the assessment
proceedings, it cannot be said that he wasn’t aware of the outcome of the
ITA No.1044/Chny/2024 (AY 2009-10) S. Ramesh :: 3 ::
assessment order. We note that the impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) is
an ex parte order qua assessee without going into the merits of the case.
The Ld.CIT(A) noted that there was a delay of more than ‘7’ years in filing
of the appeal and therefore, he didn’t condone the delay and dismissed
the appeal of the assessee.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available
on record. We note that the assessment order has been passed in this
case on 10.03.2015 for AY 2009-10; and the assessee has filed the
appeal before the Ld.CIT(A) only on 09.01.2023. Thus, there was delay
of more than ‘7’ years; and even though, the assessee has stated the
reasons as noted supra, we are of the opinion that the assessee ought to
have filed application for condonation of delay along with supporting
documents (medical certificate), affidavit, etc., before the Ld.CIT(A) and
prove his bonafides. And in the absence of the same, the Ld.CIT(A) has
not condoned the delay. However, considering the facts stated in Form
35 as noted supra, for the ends of justice and fair play, we restore the
appeal back to the file of the Ld.CIT(A) with a direction to the assessee to
file condonation application along with supporting documents before the
Ld.CIT(A); and the Ld.CIT(A) to consider the same, and pass order in
accordance to law; and if the Ld.CIT(A) is convinced with the reasons for
delay, he may condone the delay and decide the appeal on merits as
ITA No.1044/Chny/2024 (AY 2009-10) S. Ramesh :: 4 :: contemplated u/s.250(6) of the Income Tax Act, 1961; and the assessee is directed to be diligent and file written submissions/relevant documents before the First Appellate Authority to substantiate its grounds of appeal and the Ld.CIT(A) after giving proper opportunity to the assessee to pass speaking order in accordance to law.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced on the 27th day of June, 2024, in Chennai.
Sd/- Sd/- (मनोज कुमार अ�वाल) (एबी टी. वक�) (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) (ABY T. VARKEY) लेखा सद�य/ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �याियक सद�य/JUDICIAL MEMBER चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 27th June, 2024. TLN, Sr.PS आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकरआयु�/CIT, Chennai / Madurai / Salem / Coimbatore. 4. िवभागीय�ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड�फाईल/GF