DHENU SAMVARADHAN FOUNDATION,INDORE vs. THE CIT (E), BHOPAL
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
आदेश / O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by order dated 08.02.2023 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] by which the assessee’s application for grant of final registration u/s 12AA and final approval u/s 80G of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
Page 1 of 5
Dhenu Samvardhan Foundation, Indore ITA No. 117/Ind/2023
The background facts leading to present appeal are such that the
assessee is a company claiming to be engaged in charitable purpose. It was
granted provisional registration u/s 12AA as well as provisional approval
u/s 80G by Income-tax Department through two separate orders both dated
28.11.2021. Subsequently, the assessee applied for grant of final
registration u/s 12AA and final approval u/s 80G. The CIT(E), vide a
consolidated order dated 08.02.2023, rejected the final registration u/s
12AA as well as final approval u/s 80G. Aggrieved, the assessee has come in
appeal before us.
Ld. AR for assessee carried us to Para 2-3 of impugned order to show
that the CIT(E) show-caused the assessee to explain following three issues to
which the assessee filed explanation but ultimately the CIT(A) rejected
assessee’s explanation and thereby dismissed assessee’s applications:
(i) That, as per Para 3rd Part A of Memorandum of Association (MOA), the
main object of the assessee is “to carry on the business of social
welfare, religion, charity, protection of animals including cow and
provide an animal ambulance service, etc.”. Therefore, the assessee
cannot be treated as engaged in charitable purpose.
(ii) That, as per Para 3rd Part B of the MOA, objects mentioned in S.No. 6,
8, 10, 14, 20, 27 and 28 are commercial in nature and allow the
assessee to involve in commercial activities which cannot be treated
for charitable purpose. Further, the assessee is carrying out
Page 2 of 5
Dhenu Samvardhan Foundation, Indore ITA No. 117/Ind/2023
commercial activity of sale of cow milk & milk products which cannot
be treated as charitable purpose. The CIT(E) has also noted that the
assessee derived net profit of Rs. 3,54,000/- on sales-revenue of Rs.
9,91,900/- from sale of cow milk and milk products, thereby earned
35.68% net profit.
(iii) That, as per Para 3rd Part B, the objects mentioned in S.No. 8, 13, 23,
25, 26 and 29 alongwith Para 4th of the MOA contain objects which
allow the activity and application of income outside India which is not
permissible as per provisions of section 11.
Ld. AR next submitted that the assessee is established for “charitable
purpose” only. The assessee neither intended nor engaged in any ‘business’
or ‘commercial’ activity. Further, the assessee neither intended nor made
any application of funds outside India. However, for the sake of satisfaction
of CIT(E), the assessee has already amended its ‘MOA’ suitably and the copy
of amended ‘MOA’ is filed in Paper-Book. So far as the activity of selling of
cow milk and other milk products is concerned, Ld. AR submitted that when
the assessee is engaged in charitable activity of animals predominantly
cows, etc. the selling of cow milk and other milk products would be a
necessary part of such charitable activity and the CIT(E) has wrongly
understood the same as ‘business’ or ‘commercial’ activity. Then, Ld. AR
also carried us to the audited accounts of assessee filed at Page 6 and 7 of
Paper-Book to show that the assessee’s receipts from donation was Rs.
11,07,24,000/- and the receipts from sale of cow-milk and milk products
Page 3 of 5
Dhenu Samvardhan Foundation, Indore ITA No. 117/Ind/2023
was Rs. 99,19,000/-, thus the receipts from sale of cow milk and milk
products were even less than 10% of total receipts and therefore the CIT(E)
is not correct in treating the assessee as not carrying ‘charitable purpose’. In
Paper-Book, Ld. AR has also filed the copies of decisions of ITAT, Jaipur in
ITA No. 748/JP/2015 – M/s Rajasthan Gau Seva Sangh, Jaipur Vs.
CIT(Exemption), Jaipur dated 07.02.2020 and ITAT, Ahmedabad in ITA
No. 670/Ahd/2013 – Sabarmati Ashram Gaushala Trust Vs.
ADIT(Exemption) order dated 07.06.2013. With these submissions, Ld.
AR prayed that the order passed by CIT(E) deserves to be set aside and the
CIT(E) be directed to grant permanent registration/approval as applied by
assessee.
Per contra, Ld. DR for revenue submitted that the activity of selling
cow milk and milk products is in the nature of ‘business’. He further
submitted that the assessee has filed amended ‘MOA’ which was not before
CIT(E).
We have considered submissions of both sides and also perused the
documents filed in Paper-Book as well as the impugned order. After a
careful consideration, we find that the CIT(E) has referred certain clauses of
MOA and observed that the assessee’s objects or activities are ‘business’ or
‘commercial’ in nature and the assessee had authority to apply funds
outside India. But, as submitted by Ld. AR, the assessee has amended its
MOA and the copy of revised MOA is filed in Paper-Book also. This revised
MOA was not available before CIT(E) and the CIT(E) had no occasion to
Page 4 of 5
Dhenu Samvardhan Foundation, Indore ITA No. 117/Ind/2023
verify the amendments made by assessee therein. Therefore, this case must
go to CIT(E) for necessary verification. Accordingly, we are inclined to restore
this matter to CIT(E). The CIT(E) shall, after verifying the amended MOA,
also consider afresh the activities of assessee in the light of amended MOA
and the decisions of ITAT cited by Ld. AR as narrated in foregoing paras.
While doing so, the CIT(E) shall consider all submissions made by assessee
without being influenced by his earlier order. Ordered accordingly.
Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court on 26.07.2027
Sd/- sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated : 26.07.2024 CPU/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 5 of 5
