RANVEER SINGH CHHABRA,INDORE (MP) vs. ITO-2(4) INDORE, INDORE (MP)

PDF
ITA 217/IND/2024Status: DisposedITAT Indore30 July 2024AY 2012-13Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Judicial Member), SHRI B.M. BIYANI (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI

For Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 30.07.2024Pronounced: 30.07.2024

आदेश / O R D E R

Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:

Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 17.01.2024 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of assessment-order dated 31.12.2019 passed by learned ITO- 2(4), Indore [“AO”] u/s 147 r.w.s. 143(3) of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2012-13, the assessee has filed this appeal.

Page 1 of 3

Shri Ranveer Singh Chhabra, Indore. ITA No. 217/Ind/2024 - AY 2012-13 2. Ld. AR for assessee submitted that the CIT(A) has passed impugned

order ex-parte qua assessee for non-prosecution and rejected all grounds of

assessee summarily without proper adjudication. She further submitted

that as per para 4.1 of impugned order, the CIT(A) fixed three hearings out

of which first two hearings on 11.03.2020 and 21.01.2021 were during

Covid period. The third and last hearing was fixed vide notice dated

27.10.2023 on 06.11.2023 for which the assessee sought adjournment vide

application dated 06.11.2023 vide acknowledgement no. 504070021061123,

but the CIT(A) has, due to oversight, mentioned non-compliance. Ld. AR also

placed on record a copy of adjournment application filed by assessee to

CIT(A). In these circumstances, Ld. AR prayed to remand present matter to

CIT(A) for adjudication afresh after hearing assessee. Ld. DR for revenue

agrees with the submissions and prayer of Ld. AR.

3.

In view of above facts and consensus by both sides, we are remanding

this matter back to the file of CIT(A) for a proper adjudication on merit after

giving opportunity of hearing to the assessee, uninfluenced by his earlier

order in any manner. The assessee is also directed to ensure participation in

the hearings as may be fixed by CIT(A) and do not seek unnecessary

adjournments failing which the CIT(A) shall be at liberty to pass appropriate

order in accordance with law.

Page 2 of 3

Shri Ranveer Singh Chhabra, Indore. ITA No. 217/Ind/2024 - AY 2012-13

4.

Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in open court immediately after conclusion of hearing and subsequently reduced in writing on the very same day.

Sd/- sd/- (VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Indore िदनांक /Dated : 30.07.2024 CPU/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore

Page 3 of 3

RANVEER SINGH CHHABRA,INDORE (MP) vs ITO-2(4) INDORE, INDORE (MP) | BharatTax