SURYAPUTRA SHANI UPASAK SAMAJIK SAMITI,INDORE vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL

PDF
ITA 226/IND/2024Status: DisposedITAT Indore31 July 2024AY 2024-25Bench: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO (Judicial Member), SHRI B.M. BIYANI (Accountant Member)3 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE

For Appellant: Ms. Nisha Nahoti, CA & AR
For Respondent: Shri Ashish Porwal, Sr. DR
Hearing: 31.07.2024Pronounced: 31.07.2024

आदेश / O R D E R

Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:

Feeling aggrieved by order dated 09.02.2024 bearing DIN & Notice No.: ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2023-24/1060695676(1) passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Exemption), Bhopal [“CIT(E)”] by which the assessee’s application for grant of registration u/s 12AA of Income-tax Act, 1961 has been rejected, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).

Page 1 of 3

Suryaputra Shani Upasak Samajik Samiti ITA No. 226/Ind/2024

2.

Although Ld. AR for assessee filed a written-application seeking

adjournment of hearing fixed on today but, however, during hearing

requested to decide this appeal today itself. Accordingly, the hearing is

proceeded.

3.

Ld. AR next submitted that the CIT(E) has passed impugned order ex-

parte and rejected the application filed by assessee for grant of registration

u/s 12AA citing the reason “the assessee has not submitted the required

documents”. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee is a society engaged in

charitable objects and being managed by office-bearers who could not make

representation before CIT(E). However, the assessee is now ready to ensure

compliances of notices and submission of documents as would be required

by CIT(E). Ld. AR made very humble prayer that the charitable activities of

assessee-society shall be frustrated due to non-grant of registration, hence

an opportunity should be given to assessee to present its case before CIT(E)

and the case may be remanded to CIT(E).

4.

Ld. DR for revenue did not have any objection if the case is remanded

to CIT(E) for adjudication afresh.

5.

In view of consensus of both the sides, we are persuaded to remand

this matter to CIT(E) for consideration and adjudication afresh after giving

one more opportunity to assessee. The assessee is also directed to make

compliances on the hearings to be fixed by CIT(E) and do not seek

Page 2 of 3

Suryaputra Shani Upasak Samajik Samiti ITA No. 226/Ind/2024

unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(E) shall be at liberty to

pass order in accordance with law.

6.

Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.

Order pronounced in open court immediately after conclusion of hearing and reduced in writing on the same day.

Sd/- Sd/-

(VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Indore िदनांक /Dated : 31/07/2024 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore

Page 3 of 3

SURYAPUTRA SHANI UPASAK SAMAJIK SAMITI,INDORE vs CIT (EXEMPTION), BHOPAL, BHOPAL | BharatTax