SHANMUGAM AYYAPPAN PUDUKKOTTAI,PUDUKKOTTAI vs. ITO, WARD-1, PUDUKKOTTAI

PDF
ITA 54/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 July 2024AY 2017-18Bench: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY (Judicial Member), SHRI JAGADISH (Accountant Member)4 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI

Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH

Hearing: 11.07.2024Pronounced: 31.07.2024

आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ‘सी’ �ायपीठ, चे�ई। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI �ी एबी टी. वक�, �ाियक सद! एवं �ी जगदीश, लेखा सद! के सम( BEFORE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JAGADISH, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं./ITA No.54/Chny/2024 िनधा8रण वष8 /Assessment Year: 2017-18 Shanmugam Ayyappan, The Income Tax Officer , TS No.5643-5644, South 4th Street, Vs. Ward-1, Pudukkottai – 622 001. Pudukkottai. Tamil Nadu. [PAN: AEOPA 6661B] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� की ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri I. Dinesh, Advocate HIथ� की ओर से /Respondent by : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 11.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 31.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2017-18 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 08.12.2023.

2.

The only effective ground of appeal in this case is against the challenging validity of assessment order and making addition of cash

ITA No.54/Chny/2024 :- 2 -:

deposit of Rs. 36,12,200/- u/s. 69A of the Income Tax Act, 1961

(hereinafter “the Act”) during the demonetization period.

3.

The brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual

and derives income from Shrimp farming, retail trade in auto spare

parts and minor civil contracts. The assessee has not filed his return

of income by due date and therefore, notice u/s. 142(1) of the Act on

19.01.2018 to file return of income on or before 18.02.2018. However,

the assessee has failed to file the return of income within the time

given as per the said notice. The assessee has filed return of income

in paper form on 17.07.2018. The A.O invoking the amended

provisions of Section 139(4) by Finance Act, 2016 w.e.f 01.04.2017

treated the return non-est and invalid. The A.O thereafter, issued

notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act on 30.09.2019 and passed assessment

u/s. 144 of the Act making addition on cash deposit in bank account

during demonetization period at Rs. 23,66,720/-. The assessee before

us has challenged the validity of assessment order as Section 143(2)

of the Act notice was issued on invalid return. The assessee has also

submitted that as CBDT letter dated 29.11.2019 all Assessing Officers

were required to drop proceedings u/s. 143(2) of the Act in all such

cases whether section 143(2) of the Act notices were issued on invalid

return.

ITA No.54/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:

4.

The Ld. AR has submitted a copy of CBDT instructions dated

29.11.2019.

5.

The Ld. DR, Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT, also agreed that as per

CBDT Guidelines vide F.No.225/333/2019/ITA-II dated 29.11.2019,

the Assessing Officers were required to drop the proceedings u/s.

143(2) of the Act in such cases and reopen the same by issuing of

notice u/s. 148 of the Act.

6.

We have heard the rival contentions, and perused the materials

available on record. The assessee has filed return of income on

17.07.2018 which was treated as non-est and invalid by the A.O. The

CBDT vide F.No.225/333/ITA-II dated 29.11.2019 has issued

guidelines as under:

“2. It has been brought to the notice of Board under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’) were generated in respect of certain invalid returns of the assessees filed for the Assessment Year 2017-18 through CASS Cycle 2018. As the scrutiny of such returns will pose a challenge for the A.O and is bad in law, I am directed to state that Assessing Officers shall drop the proceedings u/s. 143(2) of the Act in such cases and reopen the same by issue of notice under section 148 of the Act.”

7.

As the assessment order was passed in violation of CBDT

Guidelines, supra, the assessment order passed is quashed.

ITA No.54/Chny/2024 :- 4 -:

However, liberty is granted to A.O to reopen the case in case it is permissible under law.

8.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed.

Order pronounced on 31st July, 2024.

Sd/- Sd/- (एबी टी. वक�) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (ABY. T. Varkey) लेखा सद! /Accountant Member �ाियक सद! / Judicial Member चे�ई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 31st July, 2024. EDN/- आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/CIT, Madurai 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF

SHANMUGAM AYYAPPAN PUDUKKOTTAI,PUDUKKOTTAI vs ITO, WARD-1, PUDUKKOTTAI | BharatTax