GRANTHA RESEARCH FOUNDATION,,CHENNAI vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS, , CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted a subsequent CBDT circular extending the due date for filing such applications. Therefore, the appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, allowing the assessee to file a fresh application.
What were the facts?
The assessee's application for registration under Section 80G was rejected by the CIT(E) for being filed beyond the due date. The CIT(E) held that there was no power to condone such delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(E) has the power to condone delay in filing an application for registration under Section 80G, and the impact of a subsequent CBDT circular on such rejections.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Charitable Trust v. CBDT &Anr.6 citing161 Taxmann.com 209 · 2024 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI JAGADISH
Grantha Research Foundation, The Commissioner of Income 37, Seevaram, 3rd Street, Vs. Tax (Exemptions), Perungudi, OMR, Chennai. Chennai – 600 096. [PAN: AADTG 1666M] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ< की ओर से/ Appellant by : None >?थ< की ओर से /Respondent by : Shri V. Nandakumar, CIT सुनवाई की तारीख/Date of Hearing : 24.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 31.07.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai [hereinafter “CIT(E)”] dated 18.03.2024 seeking registration u/s.80G of the Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”).
The Ld. CIT(E) rejected the application for registration on the ground that the application was filed beyond the prescribed due date
ITA No.1376/Chny/2024 :- 2 -: and that the Commissioner of Income Tax has no power to condone the delay in filing the application in Form 10AB.
We have heard the arguments of both the sides and perused the relevant material available on record. It is noted that subsequent to the order of Ld. CIT(E), the Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued a Circular No.07 of 2024 dated 25.04.2024 and has extended date for filing such applications up to 30.06.2024 for all such cases including the assessee. The relevant para of the circular is as under :
“4.1 Further, in cases where any trust, institution or fund has already made an application in Form No. l0AB, and where the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner has passed an order rejecting such application, on or before the issuance of this Circular, solely on account of the fact that the application was furnished after the due date or that the application has been furnished under the wrong section code, it may furnish a fresh application in Form No. 10AB within the extended time provided in paragraph 3(ii) i.e. 30.06.2024.”
As the assessee has already been provided an opportunity to make fresh application, the appeal filed to reconsider the application becomes infructuous. However, in case the assessee has not filed a fresh application before 30.06.2024, the application in Form No.10AB earlier submitted may be reconsidered by the Ld. CIT(E), in view of ITA No.1376/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:
decision of Hon’ble Madras High Court in the case of Shri Nrisimha Priya Charitable Trust vs. CBDT [2024] 161 taxmann.com 209 (Mad).
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 31st July, 2024.
More judgments on Section 80G
- Savan Dayalal Ladani, Rajkot vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax-2(1)…ITA 575/RJT/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Pareshbhai Savjibhai Khunt, Rajkot vs Income Tax Officer Ward - 2(2)(3), RajkotITA 842/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Modern Engineers And Contractors vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St)Andhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- K Madhusudan Reddy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 28 Oct 2026
- Sandeep Ranjan Rout vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Gagan Bihari Rout@Gagan Rout vs. State Of OdishaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Biswanath Rana vs. The Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 28 Oct 2026