NEELAM CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. CIT,EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CIT(E) should reconsider the application in the interest of natural justice. The assessee was directed to appear before the CIT(E) with all required documents.
What were the facts?
The assessee trust applied for registration under Section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application due to non-furnishing of required documents and clarifications despite multiple notices. The assessee contended that adequate opportunity was not provided.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the registration application for non-compliance without affording adequate opportunity violates principles of natural justice.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI JAGADISH
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee is against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai [hereinafter “[CIT(E)”] dated 07.03.2023 seeking registration u/s.12AB of the Income tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter “the Act”).
The only ground of appeal in this appeal of the assessee is against the rejection of application filed in Form 10AB u/s. 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act on the ground that :- 2 -: the assessee has not furnished the relevant documents and clarification. The assessee has filed online application on 30.09.2023 in Form 10AB u/s. 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act. The Ld. CIT(E) has issued letter on 29.12.2023 to furnish relevant documents and details and clarification on or before 09.01.2023. The assessee sought time till 21.01.2024. Subsequently, a show cause notice dated 26.02.2024 was issued informing the assessee to furnish the details as the limitation of time for disposal of application expired by 31.03.2024, but the assessee has failed to comply with the notices.
Before us, the Ld. AR has submitted that adequate opportunity was not given to the assessee and the order is opposed to the provisions of law and principles of natural justice. The Ld. AR has also submitted the reason for non compliance before the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. AR further submitted that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application for non prosecution and requested one more opportunity of hearing to file the details before the Ld. CIT(E).
On the other hand, the Ld. DR argued that the assessee has not made any submissions, despite of adequate opportunities provided to the assessee, therefore, appeal be dismissed. :- 3 -: 5. We have heard both the parties and gone through the order of the Ld. CIT(E). We find that the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application filed by the assessee in Form No.10AB u/s. 12(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act seeking registration u/s. 12AB of the Act due to non compliance with the notices. Before us, the Ld. AR has given the reason for non compliance. We are of the opinion that keeping in view the principles of natural justice, Ld. CIT(E) should re-consider the application. We also direct the assessee to appear before the Ld. CIT(E) on the date of hearing without fail and submit all the relevant documents sought for by the Ld. CIT(E). In view of the above, we remit the matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) to re-consider the application filed by the assessee. The appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 31st July, 2024.
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026