DCIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/S. MAGNUM TELESOFT PVT. LTD., BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that Section 68 is not applicable for additions on opening balances of loans received in earlier years. Since the amounts were received prior to the assessment year and the revenue did not controvert the assessee's submissions, the addition was not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 48,07,984/- under Section 68 on account of unsecured loans, as the assessee could not provide satisfactory explanations or confirmations from creditors. The assessee contended that the loans were old and received prior to FY 2006-07.
What were the issues?
Whether the addition of unsecured loans as income under Section 68 is justified when the loans represent opening balances from prior years and the assessee provides explanations that the transactions occurred long before the assessment year.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI N.S.SAINI, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM
Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM: The revenue has filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A)-1, Bhubaneswar, passed in ITAppeal No.0542/2014-15, dated 3.12.2015, u/s.143(3) of the Income Tax Act, wherein the revenue has raised the following grounds :- 1 On the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) is not justified in law as well as on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.48,07,984/- made by the AO u/s.68 on account of unsecured loan.
On the facts and in the circumstance
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 68
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Bliss Dealtrade Private Limited, Kolkata vs Income Tax Officer - Ward 9(2) Kolkata…ITA 208/KOL/2026[2012-13]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-13
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Ajaybhai Dineshbhai Bagdai, Near Central… vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(2)(1), New…ITA 74/RJT/2026[2013-14]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026