BALASORE BHADRAK CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BALASORE vs. ACIT, BALASORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the revision order under Section 263 was valid and within the CIT's jurisdiction, as previously upheld by a coordinate bench. Consequently, the consequential assessment order treating dividend income as taxable was also sustained.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Central Cooperative Bank, had its assessment order revised under Section 263, leading to dividend income being treated as taxable. The assessee argued that dividend income from investments in other cooperative societies should be deductible under Section 80P(2)(d).
What were the issues?
Whether dividend income earned by a cooperative society from investments in other cooperative societies is deductible under Section 80P(2)(d) and the validity of a revision order under Section 263.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 263,Section 143(3),Section 80P(2)(d),Section 10(23F),Section 10(23FA),Section 10(34)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI N.S.SAINI, AM & SHRI PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JM
Per Shri Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM: The assessee has filed an appeal against the order of CIT(A), Cuttack, dated 31.12.2014, passed in I.T.Appeal No.0206/2012-13, u/s.143(3)/263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-2008, wherein the assessee has raised the following grounds :-
The order of ld. CIT(A) Cuttack is erroneous in so far treating the dividend income as taxable ignoring the deductions available u/s.80P(2)(d).
Ld. CIT(A) Cuttack in his order has treated that dividend income is taxable since it
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Utkal Highways, Bidanasi vs. Union Of INDIAOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pradeep Kumar Behera vs. Superintendent CGST And Central Excise., CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Manas Behera vs. Commissioner, CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Pramod Kumar Nayak vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, KendraparaOrissa · 16 Oct 2026
- Nirmal Kumar Sharma S/O Ram Swroop Sharma vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 16 Oct 2026