ASSISSTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RAJPUR ROAD vs. MOHD. WASEEM, MOHALLA PATHANPURA BERIYAN
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found no error in the CIT(A)'s order to remand the matter for de-novo assessment, considering the ex-parte assessment order passed under Section 144.
What were the facts?
An ex-parte assessment order was passed against the assessee under Section 144 r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) remanded the issue to the AO for fresh assessment.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in remanding the matter to the AO for fresh assessment when an ex-parte assessment order was passed.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
Before: SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. & SHRI MANISH AGARWAL
(A.Y 2021-22) Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Mohd. Waseem Income Tax Near Dr.Naushad, Deoband, Dehradun, Saharanpur Uttarakhand Utter Pradesh-247554 PAN: ADEPW8202F Appellant Respondent Assessee by None Revenue by Sh. A. S. Rana, Sr. DR Date of Hearing 10/07/2025 Date of Pronouncement 10/07/2025 ORDER
PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM:
The present appeal is filed by the Revenue against the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) - Noida-3 (‘Ld. CIT(A)’ for short), Delhi dated 18/10/2024 for the Assessment Year 2021-22.
Facts in brief are that, an ex-parte assessment order came to be passed against the Assessee on 28/12/2022 u/s 144 r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) which has been called in question by the Assessee before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 18/10/2024, remanded the issue to the file of the A.O. for fresh assessment as per provision of law by exercising the power conferred in the proviso to Section 251(1) (a) of the Act. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Department of Revenue preferred the present Appeal.
The Ld. Departmental Representative submitted that the Ld. CIT(A) has committed error in remanding the matter to the file of the A.O., thus sought for allowing the appeal.
On hearing the Ld. Departmental Representative and verifying the material on record, we find that the assessment order has been passed u/s 144 of the Act and considering the said fact, the Ld. CIT(A) remanded the matter to the A.O. without adjudicating the issues on its merit. We find no error or infirmity in the order of the Ld. CIT(A) in remanding the issue to the file of the A.O. for framing de-novo assessment in accordance with law, thus find no merits in the grounds of Appeal of the Revenue. Accordingly the Grounds of Appeal of the Revenue are dismissed.
In the result, the Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10th July, 2025
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S Rama Krishna Industries vs. State Of Hp And OthersHimachal Pradesh · 30 Oct 2026