QUDSIA PERVEEN,NEW DELHI vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, HALDWANI, HALDWANI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, in the interest of justice, remanded the matter back to the AO to pass a fresh assessment order after providing an opportunity of hearing. The assessee was directed to participate and provide necessary evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee failed to make compliance on multiple occasions before the CIT(A) and the AO, leading to ex-parte orders. The assessee requested the case be sent back to the AO due to unavoidable circumstances.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's failure to comply with notices from tax authorities warrants setting aside the ex-parte assessment and appeal orders.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH (‘SMC’
O R D E R
PER MANISH AGARWAL, AM:
This appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Delhi (‘the Ld. CIT(A)’ for short) dated 29.05.2023 in appeal No. CIT (A), Haldwani/10003/2018-19 for Assessment Year 2010-11.
The assessee has challenged the order of the Ld. CIT(A) wherein the Ld. CIT(A) has confirmed the order of the AO mainly for the reason that on 5 occasions the case was listed for hearing, however, the /DDN/2025 Qudsia Perveen vs. CIT assessee failed to make any compliance. Now before us, the Ld. AR of the assessee submits that due to unavoidable circumstances, compliance could not be made before the Ld. CIT(A) and further no compliance was made before the AO and the assessment order was also passed ex-parte. He thus requested that the matter be sent back to the file of the AO where the assessee will make necessary compliance and will file all the requisite details.
On the other hand, the Ld. Sr. DR has objected to the request of the assessee.
Heard both the parties. From the perusal of the appellate order, it is seen that Ld. CIT(A) has provided several opportunities to the assessee however, the assessee failed to respond thus the ld. CIT(A) was compelled to confirm the additions made by the AO. It is true that assessee has not filed any submission before the CIT(A) in support of the grounds of appeal taken. Further from the perusal of the assessment order, it is seen that no compliance was made before the AO also. In view of these facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice, the matter is remand back to the file of the AO to pass the assessment order denovo fresh after providing the opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to participate before the AO in the proceedings and file all the necessary evidences in support of the claim with regard to the source of cash deposit into bank. With these directions, all the grounds of appeal of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026