Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Ld. PCIT for AY 2015-16. There was an inordinate delay of 1356 days in filing the appeal. The assessee requested condonation of delay citing COVID-19 situations and issues with restarting business and advice from legal professionals.
Held
The Tribunal held that the reasons provided for the delay were casual, not supported by material, and did not constitute sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay. The assessee and their representative did not appear before the Tribunal.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned based on the reasons provided by the assessee.
Sections Cited
IT Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI
ORDER PER YOGESH KUMAR, U.S. JM: The present appeal is filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (‘Ld. PCIT’ for short), Haldwani, Uttarakhand, dated 26/02/2020 for the Assessment Year 2015-16.
None appeared for the Assessee. Right from filing of the appeal, neither the Assessee nor the Representative of the Assessee have appeared or made any submission. Therefore, we are compel to decide the Appeal on hearing the Ld. Department's Representative and perusing the material available on record.
There is an inordinate delay of 1356 days in filing the present Appeal. The Assessee filed an application for condonation of delay contending that ‘due to Covid-19 situations and due to giving entire attention on restarting his factory and business and also due to the advice of lawyers and CAs who gave different kinds of opinion which confused the Assessee whether to go for appeal or not.’ The said reasons provided in the application for condonation of delay is not only casual in nature and also not supported with any material. In our considered opinion, the Assessee has failed to explain sufficient cause to condone the inordinate delay of 1356 days. Accordingly, the present Appeal is dismissed for delay in latches.
Order pronounced in the open court on 10th September, 2025 Sd/- Sd/-