RAMA RANI W/O JOGINDER SINGH,PANIPAT vs. ITO WARD -5, PANIPAT
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order without deciding the appeal on merit. In the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the CIT(A) to grant one final opportunity to the assessee.
What were the facts?
The assessee's case was reopened under Section 147 for alleged non-disclosure of capital gains on property sale. The Assessing Officer made additions for capital gains and unexplained cash deposits. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte due to non-compliance.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without deciding the appeal on merit. Whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity to be heard.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH: ‘SMC’ NEW DELHI
Before: SHRI R.K. PANDA
ORDER This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the ex- parte order dated 21.12.2018 of the Ld. CIT(Appeals), Karnal relating to AY 2010-11.
The assessee in the various grounds of appeal has challenged the ex-parte order passed by the CIT(A) without deciding the issue on merit and thereby sustaining the addition made by the AO.
Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is an individual and had filed her return of income on 20.10.2011 declaring total income of Rs. 1,54,800/-. The case of the assessee was reopened u/s 147 of the I.T. Act on the ground that assessee has not disclosed the capital gain on sale of immovable property in cash for a net consideration of Rs. 4,31,000/-. Notice u/s 148 was accordingly issued. The assessee in response to the same filed the copy of the return already filed declaring taxable income of Rs. 1,54,800/-. The AO in the order passed u/s 143(3)/147 of the Act determined the total income of the assessee at Rs. 9,75,319/-, wherein he made addition of Rs. 2,20,519/- on account of long term capital gain and Rs. 1 lakh and Rs. 5 lakh respectively being unexplained cash deposit in the bank account. Since, there was no compliance from the side of the assessee, the Ld. CIT(A), in the ex-parte order passed by her dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee.
Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A) the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that Ld. CIT(A) has passed the ex-parte order and has not decided the appeal on merit. He submitted that in the interest of justice, the matter may be restored to the file of the CIT(A) and the assessee be given an opportunity of being heard.
The Ld. DR on the other hand, heavily relied on the order of the CIT(A).
After hearing both the sides, I find that the Ld. CIT(A) in the instant case, has dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee due to non-appearance and has not decided the appeal on merit. Considering the totality of the facts of the case and in the interest of justice, I deem it proper to restore the issue to the file of CIT(A) with a direction to grant one final opportunity to the assessee to substantiate her case and decide the issue as per fact and law. The assessee is also hereby directed to appear before the CIT(A) without seeking any adjournment under any pretext failing which the Ld. CIT(A) is at liberty to pass appropriate order as per law. The grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed for statistical purposes.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ayush Sureshchandra Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- Sureshchandra Moolchand Shah vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Larsen And Toubro Limited vs. Joint Commissioner Of Central GST And Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- T C Global INDIA Private Limited vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central GST, North DelhiDelhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Kamlasana Impex Private Limited vs. Director General Of GST Intelligence (Hq) Delhi) & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026