OCTAVIUS TEA & INDUSTRIES LTD,KOLKATA vs. D.C.I.T CIR - 4,KOLKATA, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal, stating that the assessee should not be penalized for the fault of their Authorized Representative. The impugned order of the CIT(A) was set aside.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) with a delay of five months. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without admitting it due to the delay. The assessee's Chartered Accountant misplaced the file, leading to the delay.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal before the CIT(A) should be condoned and the matter decided on merits.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri A. T. Varkey, JM & Shri Waseem Ahmed, AM]
ORDER
Per Shri A.T.Varkey, JM
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of Ld. CIT(A)-IV, Kolkata dated 16.01.2013 for AY 2008-09.
None appeared on behalf of the assessee but an adjournment application has been filed, which is placed on record. However, on perusal of the impugned order we note that it is an ex parte order of the Ld. CIT(A). We note that the Ld. CIT(A) has not admitted the appeal on the ground that there was a delay of five months in filing the appeal. We take note that the assessee in its application for condonation of delay has stated that the Chartered Accountant who was entrusted the case could not file the appeal because the file was misplaced. When the AO issued notice of penalty, then only the assessee came to know that the appeal has not been filed before the Ld. CIT(A). Thereafter, the assessee without the delay immediately filed the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). For the fault of the Ld. AR of the assessee, the assessee should not be penalized. Therefore, we are inclined to condone the delay of five months in filing the appeal and, we set aside the impugned order of the Ld. CIT(A) and remit the matter back to the file of the Ld. CIT(A) to be decided on merits. Needless to say, sufficient Octavius Tea & Industries Ltd. AY 2008-09 opportunity to be granted to the assessee before disposing of the appeal by a speaking order. Appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. 3. In the result, appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order is pronounced in the open court. Sd/- Sd/- (Waseem Ahmed) (Aby. T. Varkey) Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated : 3rd May, 2017 Jd.(Sr.P.S.) Copy of the order forwarded to:
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dipanshu Aggarwal vs. Director General Of GST IntelligenceDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Dezinetree Projects PVT. LTD. vs. Spokes Digital Inc And AnrDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Jaydeep Jayantilal Hudaka vs. State Of GujaratGujarat · 28 Oct 2026
- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026