SHREE GANESH BUILDCON,BHOPAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER-1(2), BHOPAL, BHOPAL
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Per Vijay Pal Rao, JM:
This appeal by the assesse is directed against the order dated
29.01.2024 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National
Faceless Appeal Centers,(NFAC), Delhi for A.Y.2017-18.
Assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:
ITA No.220/Ind/2024 Shree Ganesh Buildcon
“01. The Appellant Firm could not get proper and meaningful opportunity to defend his case before Id. A.O. and/or ld. CIT-Appeals because in view of Non-cooperation of the Previous Counsel, the Notices issued by the Id. A.O. during the course of the Assessment Proceedings and subsequently by the Id. CIT-Appeals could not reach up-to the Appellant and as such right from beginning, it was absolutely unaware of the Ongoing Assessment/Appellate Proceeding. It was more so because the Working partner looking after Taxation Matter, is suffering from Cancer and continuously under Medical Supervision of the Doctors, who require him to attend Hospital every now and then. Therefore, the Orders passed by Id. A.O. and Id. CIT-Appeals are against the principals of natural justice, which may kindly be Set-aside to meet the ends of justice.
That on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Id. C.I.T. (Appeals) has Grossly erred in sustaining following Additions which were made in a baseless and Unlawful manner by the ld. A.O. in his Assessment Order dated 26.12.2019: a) Bank Deposit Rs. 21,20,900/- b) Advances Extended Rs. 3,64,78,663/- c) Penal Charges Rs. 4283/- d) Adhoc Disallowance of Expenses in order to prevent leakage of Revenue Rs. 21,51,903/-
Therefore, above arbitrary and unlawful additions may kindly be deleted.”
At the time of hearing the Ld. AR of the assessee submitted
that CIT(A) has disposed off the appeal of the assessee ex-parte as
the assessee could not file any submissions before CIT(A). He has
referred to the observation of the CIT(A) in para 5.5 of the impugned
order and submitted that the addition was confirmed by the CIT(A)
for want of explanation as well as supporting evidences including 2
ITA No.220/Ind/2024 Shree Ganesh Buildcon books of accounts. Ld. AR has submitted that the A.O has made
addition without going through the submission filed by the
assessee and books of accounts produced through e-mail. The
assessee has also explained the reasons for not producing the
documents as the assessee was suffering from cancer and
undergoing the treatment and therefore, assessee was out of
station. The Ld. AR has further submitted that when finally the
assessee wanted to produce the entire relevant record the A.O told
the assessee that he is not having time and cannot read the
submissions.
3.1 Thus, Ld. AR has submitted that due to paucity of time with
the A.O he did not allow the entire record to be produced before
him. Therefore additions made by the A.O and confirmed by the
CIT(A) are not justified. He has pleaded that the matter may be
remanded to the record of jurisdictional A.O for fresh adjudication
after considering the relevant record including books of accounts.
On the other hand Ld. Departmental Representative has
submitted that the assessee was given more than sufficient
opportunities however, the assessee could not produce the relevant
ITA No.220/Ind/2024 Shree Ganesh Buildcon records before the A.O as well as CIT(A). He has relied upon the
orders of the lower authorities.
We have heard rival submissions as well as relevant material
on record. The A.O has made additions as per the total income
computed in para 9 as under:
“9. Total income of the assessee is computed as under :- Income as per return filed on 31.03.2017 Rs. Nil Add 1. addition as per para 4 above Rs.21,20,900/- 2. Addition as per para 5 above Rs. 52,504/- 3. Addition as per para 6 above Rs.3,64,78,663/- 4. Addition as per para 7 above Rs. 4,283/- 5. Addition as per para 8 above Rs. 21,51,903/- Total assessed income Rs. 4,08,08,253/- Rounded off Rs. 4,08,08,250/- Assessed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Penalty proceedings u/s 270 272A (1)(d) and 271AAC are also initiated separately. Charge interest u/s 234A, 234B and 234C as per rule. Give credit for pre-paid taxes as per proof on record. Issue Demand Notice & Challan.”
All these additions were made by the A.O because the
assessee failed to furnish the requisite details and supporting
evidence in response to the notice issued by the A.O. It is pertinent
to note that the A.O issued the notice through ITBA and therefore
not through physical or separate notice was issued to the assessee
ITA No.220/Ind/2024 Shree Ganesh Buildcon either through e-mail or registered post. The CIT(A) has recorded
the explanation of the assessee in para 2.2 of the impugned order
as under:
2.2 Along with the grounds of appeal, the appellant has submitted a brief statement of facts which gives an overview of the circumstances of the case. This is as under:
The addition made by assessing officer without going through submission filled online and books of account produced on mail soft copy also details PF advances and required documents produced was not in Bhopal due to illness and cancer operation of myself and at last the assessing officer told that I am not having time so I cannot able to read all your submission I make the addition and you can go in appeal. This is not the justice.”
6.1 Thus, the assessee explained the reasons for delay in filing the
appeal and production of the documents as the assessee was
suffering from cancer and undergoing treatment. Despite recording
this explanation the CIT(A) has proceeded with the appeal without
even asking the assessee to furnish the relevant details and
documents. Accordingly, in the facts and circumstances of the case
we are of the considered opinion that the matter requires
reconsideration at the level of the A.O after giving one more
opportunity to the assessee to produce the relevant details,
supporting evidences as well as books of accounts. Hence, the
ITA No.220/Ind/2024 Shree Ganesh Buildcon impugned order of the CIT(A) is set aside and the matter is
remanded to the record of the A.O for fresh adjudication.
The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in the open court on 09.10.2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (B.M. BIYANI) (VIJAY PAL RAO) Accountant Member Judicial Member
Indore,_09.10.2024 Dev/Sr. PS
Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPY Sr. Private Secretary Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
