Facts
The assessee's appeal was preferred against an ex parte order of the Ld.CIT(A) and the Assessment Order, which was also passed ex parte under section 144. The assessee submitted financial documents for the first time before the Tribunal.
Held
The Tribunal noted that both the Ld.CIT(A) and AO had passed ex parte orders. Considering that the assessee had filed relevant documents for the first time, the Tribunal granted an opportunity for de novo assessment.
Key Issues
Whether the ex parte orders passed by the lower authorities were justified, and if the assessee should be given another opportunity to present their case with relevant documents.
Sections Cited
144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
आदेश / O R D E R
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM:
This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter in short "the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 24.11.2023 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter in short "AY”) 2017-18.
At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee submitted that the Ld.CIT(A) has passed order ex parte without hearing the assessee, and likewise the Assessment Order was also passed u/s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short "the Act”) i.e, the best judgment assessment; and also pointed out that before this Tribunal, the assessee for the first time has filed financials/relevant documents and other evidences (income and expenditure account, balance sheet, etc.), which are relevant for assessment. Therefore, he prayed that the assessee be granted an opportunity before the AO and relied on the decision the Hon’ble Supreme Court TIN Box Co. v. CIT reported in [2001] 249 ITR 216 (SC).
Per contra, the Ld.DR doesn’t want us to give one more innings to the assessee.
Aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We note that impugned order of the Ld.CIT(A) is an ex parte order qua assessee and likewise, the AO has also passed an ex parte order qua assessee; and the assessee has filed income & expenditure account, balance sheet and other relevant documents for the first time before this Tribunal, which needs to be considered by the AO for correctly framing the assessment. Considering the aforesaid facts, for the ends of justice and fair-play, we are inclined to grant one more opportunity to assessee before the AO. For taking such a recourse, we rely on the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of TIN Box Co. v. CIT reported in [2001] 249 ITR 216 (SC) and set aside the impugned order of (AY 2017-18) Shri R. Vijayalayan, the Ld.CIT(A) and remand the assessment back to the file of the AO for de novo assessment and the assessee is directed to be diligent and file written submissions/relevant documents before the AO and to participate in the assessment proceedings and the AO to frame assessment in accordance to law after hearing the assessee.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.