Facts
The assessee, Sri Maruti Raghavendra Seva Samithi, applied for registration in Form 10AB, mentioning its activities as 'Religious cum Charitable'. The CIT(E) rejected the application, stating that registration under Section 80G is only for purely charitable trusts, not religious or religious-cum-charitable ones. The assessee argued that some of its objects were incidental and religious activities were limited to 5% of income.
Held
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) could have considered the application by ignoring the incidental religious objects. The impugned order was set aside and the case was restored to the CIT(E) for fresh adjudication, after giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard.
Key Issues
Whether a trust applying as 'Religious cum Charitable' is eligible for registration under Section 80G, and if the CIT(E) can reject the application without considering incidental religious objects.
Sections Cited
Section 80G(5), Section 80G(5B), Section 12AB, Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM & HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ‘बी’ �ायपीठ चे�ई म�। IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI माननीय �ी मनोज कुमार अ�वाल ,लेखा सद� एवं माननीय �ी मनु कुमार िग�र, �ाियक सद� के सम�। BEFORE HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM AND HON’BLE SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI, JM आयकरअपील सं./ ITA No.1001/Chny/2024. Sri Maruti Raghavendra Seva Vs. The Commissioner of Income Tax, Samithi, (Exemptions) No.8, Kirubananda Variyar Street, Chennai. Jothi Nagar Colony, Pollachi, Coimbatore 642 001. [PAN: ABFTS 3580D] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��यथ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ��यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. V. Nandakumar, IRS, CIT. सुनवाई क� तार�ख/Date of Hearing : 13.08.2024 घोषणा क� तार�ख /Date of Pronouncement : 21.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R PER MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), Chennai dated 22.03.2024.
Brief facts of the case are that the applicant in the application filed in Form 10AB, has mentioned the nature of activity of the trust as 'Religious cum Charitable and also in the object column, it has mentioned one of the objects as 'Religious'.
The ld. CIT(E) of the Act is of the view that the applicant has applied as 'Religious cum Charitable trust’ in Form 10AB dated 29.09.2023 and not as 'Charitable' trust. When the mistake was pointed out by the ld. CIT(E) to the applicant, assessee has requested that approval may be granted to the trust treating it as Charitable Trust, ignoring nature of activities mentioned as 'Religious cum Charitable and objects mentioned as 'Religious' in the application in Form 10AB. Further, the applicant vide its reply dated 15.03.2024 stated that the trust is established to carry out the charitable activity to the public at large without any discrimination with respect to the caste or creed. The applicant further stated that out of total 17 objects of the trust, 12 are for charitable activities and 5 objects are incidental to the main objects which the trust might carry out on certain occasions. Also, the applicant stated that as per the provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act, the trust is allowed to carry out religious activities to the extent 5% of the total income of the trust.
However, the ld. CIT (Exemption) has not accepted the same for the following reasons:- ‘’iv) As per the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a trust seeking registration u/s. 80G(5) of the Act, has to be a public charitable trust and not a religious trust or religious cum charitable. v) The CIT(E) can grant registration only based on the application filed by the applicant in Form 10AB. The System also process the application based on the application filed by the applicant. Processing of application and granting of approval are carried in ITBA and there is no functionality available in the system to change the nature of trust and objects mentioned in Form 10AB other than applied in the application filed in Form 10AB and grant approval. vi) It is further noticed that the assessee trust has applied on 29.09.2023 seeking registration u/s 12AB in Form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Act as 'Religious cum Charitable' trust only and not as Charitable trust. vii) Further, the facts and the circumstances of the case laws referred by the applicant is not similar to the instant case. The applicant has not spent any amount towards any of its objects in the F.Y.2022-23 and no bifurcation of any projected expenses are furnished by the applicant in order to establish that the expenses incurred towards religious objects would be restricted to 5% of the total income of the trust. Further, there is no clause in the trust deed, quoted by the applicant, mentioning that the expenses towards religious objects will be restricted to 5% of the total income of the trust as specified in the section 80G(5B) of the Act viii) Since there is no specific clause in its trust deed restricting the religious expenses to 5% as per the provisions of section 80G(5B) of the Act and also part of its objects in the trust deed are religious in nature, the trust cannot be treated as Charitable. Apart from the above, the approval u/s 80G can be granted only to a Charitable trust. Since the assessee trust is Religious cum Charitable trust, it is not eligible for approval u/s 80G of the Act. ix) In view of the above, the application in Form No. 10AB filed by the applicant on 22.09.2023 cannot be processed’’.
Further, the appellant filed the appeal against the order of the ld. CIT(E) dated 22.03.2024 before us.
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the appellant submitted that Ld. CIT(E) has passed the impugned order without assigning proper reason and justification. Ld. Counsel for the appellant further stated that the impugned order has been passed without application of mind.
The Ld. Counsel for the assessee in sum and substance argued the same points as raised in the grounds of appeal
. Ld. Counsel further contended that the ld. CIT(E) may ignore the ‘’religious cum charitable‘’ five objects as mentioned in clause 2(b) to 2(f) which are incidental to main objects.
7. On the other hand, the ld. Senior Departmental Representative supported the order of the ld. CIT(E) and prayed for dismissal of appeal.
We have heard the rival submission and perused the impugned order and find that the ld. CIT(E) of the Act could have considered the application filed in form 10AB ignoring the incidental five objects to the main objects which are wrongly find mentioned in clause 2(b) to 2(f) of the Trust deed. Accordingly the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is restored back to the file of the ld. CIT (E) for adjudication of the application filed in form 10AB afresh after ignoring the objects mentioned in clause 2(b) to 2(f) of the deed after affording proper opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to assist the ld. CIT(E) in fresh adjudication. The ld. CIT(E) shall be at liberty to proceed with the disposal of the application filed in form 10AB.
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose. Order pronounced in the open court on 21st August, 2024 at Chennai.