← Back to search

TANEJA CONSTRUCTION UDYOG LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 27, NEW DELHI

PDF
ITA 5930/DEL/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 November 20253 pages

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCHES : A : NEW DELHI

Before: SHRI S. RIFAUR RAHMAN & SHRI ANUBHAV SHARMAAssessment Year : 2009-10

For Appellant: None
For Respondent: Shri Amit Jain, CIT-DR
Hearing: 10.09.2025Pronounced: 26.11.2025

PER ANUBHAV SHARMA, JM:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order dated
01.08.2018 of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-29, New Delhi
(hereinafter referred as Ld. First Appellate Authority or in short Ld. ‘FAA’) in appeal No.05/2017-18/CIT(A)-29 arising out of the appeal before it against the order dated 30.03.2017 passed u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter referred as ‘the Act’) by the DCIT, Central Circle-27, New Delhi
(hereinafter referred to as the Ld. AO).
2

2.

None appeared for the assessee at the time of hearing and the record shows that the assessee has been served notices repeatedly. Earlier, this appeal was dismissed on 01.04.2019 for non-appearance of the assessee and, subsequently, the order was recalled on 23.05.2025. Even at that time actually none appeared for the assessee. There is no justification to issue further notices.

3.

On hearing the ld. DR and perusing the record, we find that the assessee’s return of income was filed at nil, but, during the assessment Rs.4,60,300/- was added as unaccounted expenditure met from undisclosed sources which was confirmed by the ld. FAA and the concealment of this income has led to levy of this penalty. We find that the assessment proceedings were initiated on the basis of documents found in search and in the assessment proceedings itself the AO had mentioned that there is a concealment of true particulars of income leading to levy of penalty. Thus, the grounds raised in the present appeal that there is no reason given for issuance of notice u/s 271(1)(c) of the Act has no substance. The grounds have no substance. The appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

4.

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed.

Order pronounced in the open court on 26.11.2025. (S. RIFAUR RAHMAN)
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Dated: 26th November, 2025. 3

Rohit, Sr. PS

TANEJA CONSTRUCTION UDYOG LTD.,,NEW DELHI vs DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE- 27, NEW DELHI | BharatTax