RAHUL TANTED,INDORE vs. JCIT, R-1, INDORE
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, INDORE BENCH, INDORE
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI B.M. BIYANI
आदेश / O R D E R
Per B.M. Biyani, A.M.:
Feeling aggrieved by appeal-order dated 12.12.2023 passed by learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi [“CIT(A)”] which in turn arises out of penalty-order dated 22.09.2022 passed by learned JCIT, Range-1, Indore [“AO”] u/s 271D of Income-tax Act, 1961 [“the Act”] for Assessment-Year [“AY”] 2015-16, the assessee has filed this appeal on the grounds mentioned in Appeal Memo (Form No. 36).
Page 1 of 3
Shri Rahul Tanted ITA No. 123/Ind/2024 - AY 2015-16
There is a small delay of 2 days in filing this appeal. Ld. AR for
assessee submits that the delay has occurred because it took time to engage
counsel for filing of appeal. Ld. AR further submits that the delay is not
attributable to any negligence, malafide intention or ulterior motive and the
assessee does not derive any benefit by making delay. He prays to condone
delay. Ld. DR for revenue did not object to the submission of Ld. AR.
Considering the explanation submitted by assessee, we are inclined to
condone small delay of 2 days and the appeal is proceeded for hearing.
Ld. AR then submits that the assessee has been provided two
opportunities by CIT(A) through notices dated 09.06.2023 and 04.12.2023
but those notices could not reach to the attention of assessee and hence the
assessee could not make representation before CIT(A). Therefore, the CIT(A)
has passed impugned order ex-parte to assessee while upholding the
penalty imposed by AO. Ld. AR submits that the assessee is ready and
willing to make representation before CIT(A) if an opportunity is given and
prays that the present matter should be remanded to the file of CIT(A) for a
proper adjudication of the grounds/issues raised by assessee in first-appeal.
Ld. DR for revenue agrees with the prayer of Ld. AR but makes a request to
direct the assessee to represent his case before CIT(A) and do not seek
unnecessary adjournments.
Considering above submissions and also having regard to the
principle of natural justice and fair play, we deem it fit to remand this
matter back to the file of CIT(A) for adjudication afresh after giving necessary
Page 2 of 3
Shri Rahul Tanted ITA No. 123/Ind/2024 - AY 2015-16
opportunities of hearing to assessee. The CIT(A) shall pass an appropriate
order uninfluenced by his earlier order. The assessee is also directed to
ensure participation in the hearings as may be fixed by CIT(A) and do not
seek unnecessary adjournments failing which the CIT(A) shall be at liberty
to pass appropriate order in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly.
Resultantly, this appeal is allowed for statistical purpose.
Order pronounced in open court immediate after conclusion of hearing and subsequently reduced in writing on the very same day.
(VIJAY PAL RAO) (B.M. BIYANI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER
Indore िदनांक /Dated : 16.10.2024 Dev/Sr. PS Copies to: (1) The appellant (2) The respondent (3) CIT (4) CIT(A) (5) Departmental Representative (6) Guard File By order UE COPYAssistant Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Indore Bench, Indore
Page 3 of 3
