KALYANASUNDARAM SURESH,CHENNAI vs. ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The tribunal held that Section 127 of the Income Tax Act was not applicable as the transfer was within the same range due to a change in monetary limits. It also dismissed grounds related to the limitation of notices and additions made on account of credit card payments, finding no infirmity in the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed against an order for AY 2013-14. The appeal raised grounds regarding the legality of case transfer, limitation of notices, and additions made to income. The tribunal considered additional grounds raised by the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the transfer of the assessee's case was in accordance with Section 127, and if notices issued were within the limitation period. Whether additions made on account of credit card payments were justified without rejection of books of accounts.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(13)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. M.K. Brothers262 citing163 ITR 249 · 1987 · HC
- CIT v. Bhaichand H. Gandhi237 citing141 ITR 67 · 1983 · HC
- Dhakeswari Cotton Mills Ltd. v. CIT79 citing26 ITR 126 · 1955 · Read judgment
- 592 (Guj.) Ravjibhai Becharbhai Dhamelia v. ACIT62 citing160 Taxmann.com 93 · 2024 · HC
- Smt. Manshi Mahendra Pitkar v. ITO 1(2), Thane41 citing73 Taxmann.com 68 · 2016 · ITAT
- Ajantha Industries v. CBDT28 citing102 ITR 281 · 1976 · SC
- Janardan Prasad Ashok Kumar v. CIT11 citing193 ITR 186 · 1992 · HC
- Ashok Kumar Rastogi v. CIT10 citing241 ITR 464 · 2000 · HC
- Rahmat Development & Engg. Corpn v. CIT8 citing130 ITR 602 · 1981 · HC
- Akberally Esufally v. CIT6 citing60 ITR 563 · 1966 · HC
- Jatindra Nath Sarmah v. ITO6 citing113 ITR 898 · 1978 · HC
- Mihir Chatterjee v. CIT6 citing205 ITR 270 · 1994 · HC
- DSP Chennai v. K Insbasagaran3 citing1 SCC 420 · 2006
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunatha
PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 28.12.2018 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Chennai for the assessment year 2013-14. 2. The ld. AR Shri K. Ravi Kannan, Advocate drew our attention to the additional grounds of appeal filed on 10
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 127
- Radhakishan Potharajula, Karim Nagar vs ITO (Int Taxn)-2, HyderabadITA 2340/HYD/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30- Delhi., DelhiITA 2305/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Kishor Kumar Aggarwal, Gurgaon vs ACIT-Central Circle-30, DelhiITA 2304/DEL/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed7 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward 6(1), HyderabadITA 1944/HYD/2025[2014-15]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2014-15
- Chenna Narayana Chakka, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward-6(1), HyderabadITA 1943/HYD/2025[2013-14]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2013-14
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026