M/S TRUST OF SHRI RADHA KRISHAN MANDIR,PATIALA vs. CIT(E), CHANDIGARH
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the CIT(E) had not properly examined the facts and had not given the appellant a proper opportunity to present its case. Therefore, the matter was restored to the CIT(E) for a fresh decision.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Trust of Shri Radha Krishan Mandir, applied for registration under Section 12AA of the Income-tax Act. The CIT(Exemptions) rejected the application, citing general observations about the use of land and doubts about the entity's identity.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(Exemptions) properly considered the assessee's application for registration and provided adequate opportunity for the assessee to present its case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
आदेश/Order
Per Sanjay Garg, Judicial Member:
The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee / appellant against the order dated 25.09.2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemptions), Chandigarh [hereinafter referred to as ‘CIT(E)’] rejecting the application of the assessee for registration u/s 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act').
At the outset, Ld. Counsel for the appellant has invited our attention to para 7 of the impugned order of the Ld. CIT (E) and has contended that it was specifically pleaded before the Ld. CIT(E) that the appellant is a
ITA No. 1564-Chd-2017- Trustof Radha Krishan Mandir, Chandigarh 2
‘Mandir Trust’ and it has constructed a temple, wherein, other public
welfare amenities have also been provided / maintained including a
common hall which is available for use for general public. That the
appellant trust has been involved in charitable and religious activities.
However, the Ld. CIT (E) in his findings has given a general observation
that the use of the land has been bestowed upon a particular entity and
further he has doubted about the identity of the entity itself, whereas, the
appellant had specifically pleaded about all the relevant facts that the
appellant is a society and is maintaining aforesaid institution and is
engaged in charitable and religious activities. The Ld. Counsel has further
submitted that the Ld. CIT (E) has not properly examined the facts of the
case and even not given proper opportunity to the appellant / assessee to
present its case to furnish the necessary and relevant evidences.
The Ld. DR, on the other hand, has relied upon the findings of the
Ld. CIT (E).
After considering the rival submissions and after going though the
impugned order, we find that in this case the facts and evidences have not
been properly appreciated. The matter needs a fresh examination at the end
of the CIT(E) so as to arrive at conclusion about the charitable and
religious nature of the activities carried out by the of the appellant trust.
Therefore, the impugned order of the CIT is set aside and the matter is
restored to the file of the CIT (E) for decision afresh in accordance with
law. Needless to say that the CIT (E) will give proper opportunity to the
appellant to present its case. The appellant is also directed to present itself
ITA No. 1564-Chd-2017- Trustof Radha Krishan Mandir, Chandigarh 3
through its representative as and when called for by the Ld. CIT(E) and fully cooperate in furnishing the necessary documents and evidences and not seek unnecessary adjournments. With the above observations, the appeal of the appellant is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the Open Court immediately on completion of hearing.
Sd/ Sd/-
(अ�नपूणा� गु�ता / ANNAPURNA GUPTA) (संजय गग� / SANJAY GARG) लेखा सद�य/ Accountant Member �या�यक सद�य/ Judicial Member Dated : 19.12. 2018 “आर.के.” आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ�/ The Appellant 2. ��यथ�/ The Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�त/ CIT 4. आयकर आयु�त (अपील)/ The CIT(A) 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य आ�धकरण, च�डीगढ़/ DR, ITAT, CHANDIGARH 6. गाड� फाईल/ Guard File
आदेशानुसार/ By order, सहायक पंजीकार/ Assistant Registrar
More judgments on Section 12AA
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Sri Jawahar Education Trust, Chamarajanagar vs The Income Tax Officer Ward 1…ITA 1735/BANG/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 6(1), MohaliITA 636/CHANDI/2024[2021-22]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Punjab Urban Planning and Development… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 635/CHANDI/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed1 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026