WE CARE,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD 1, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals, noting that the delay was not deliberate or negligent, and that the non-compliance with CIT(E)'s directions was due to a change of address. The Tribunal set aside the order of the Ld. CIT(E) and restored the applications to the file of the Ld. CIT(E) for a decision on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a Trust, filed applications for registration under Section 12AB and approval under Section 80G. The applications were rejected by the Ld. CIT(E) ex-parte due to non-compliance, allegedly because notices were sent to an old address. The assessee also had a delay in filing the present appeals.
What were the issues?
Whether the ex-parte rejection of applications for registration and approval was justified, and whether the delay in filing appeals should be condoned.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A(1)(ac)(i),Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi),Section 12AB,Section 80G(5),Section 80G(iv),Section 11
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI AMITABH SHUKLA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: These are appeals preferred by the assessee against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), (hereinafter in short "the Ld.CIT(E)”), Chennai, dated 08.09.2023 rejecting the application dated 22.03.2023 in Form 10AB u/s.12A(1)(ac)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter in short "the Act”) for registration
u/s.12AB of the Act as well as application filed under clause (iii) of first
ITA Nos.
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A(1)(ac)(i)
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Ila Palchoudhuri Foundation, Kolkata vs C.I.T. (Exemption), KolkataITA 2344/KOL/2026[-]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026
- Best India Business Promotion Centre, Jaipur vs CIT Exemption, JaipurITA 717/JPR/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Human Help Charitable Trust, Sikar vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 703/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed30 Sept 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Manoj Kumar Das vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Superwealth Financial Enterprises Private Limited, Khordha vs. Joint Commissioner Good And Service Tax Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Simanchal Sahoo vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Prafulla Chandra Khatua, Mayurbhanj vs. The State Tax Officer Of CT And GST, MayurbhanjOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S.Sidhivinayak Roadways, Sundergarh vs. Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise, Rourkela Commissionerate, RourkelaOrissa · 15 Oct 2026