Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) vs. Hyderabad Race Club
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal failed to consider the specific legal question raised by the Revenue regarding the application of the Rs. 2,500 threshold to individual payments. Therefore, the matter was remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh examination.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's order regarding the threshold limit of Rs. 2,500 for TDS under Section 194BB. The ITAT had allowed the threshold on each transaction, but the Revenue argued that the question of whether the threshold applied to individual payments exceeding Rs. 2,500 was not considered.
What were the issues?
Whether the threshold limit of Rs. 2,500 for TDS under Section 194BB applies to each individual payment exceeding that amount, or if the balance after deducting the threshold is subject to TDS.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 194BB
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
ITTA.No.652 & 658 of 2015 COMMON JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
Heard Sri B.Narasimha Sarma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax, and Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-assessee and, with their consent, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission. These two appeals are preferred by the Revenue against the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad. The Revenue raised a specific ground, before the Tribunal, that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Hyderabad had erred in granting the threshold limit of Rs.2,500/- on each transaction for the assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09, and in deleting the addition made under Section 194BB of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”). The Tribunal, however, proceeded on the premise that what was disallowed by the assessing authority was the aggregate of the transactions; and held that it is only if each payment exceeds a sum of Rs.2,500/- can tax be deducted at source and not otherwise. The question before the Tribunal was not whether tax deduction at source is applicable for each payment exceeding Rs.2,500/-, or payments exceeding Rs.2,500/- in aggregate. What was put in issue by the Revenue before the Tribunal was that, even for each individual payment exceeding Rs.2,500/-, whether the assessee was entitled to deduct Rs.2,500/- as the threshold limit, and deduct TDS only for the balance. This question of law, though specifically raised by the Revenue before the Tribunal, has not even been considered, let alone answered. We consider it appropriate, therefore, to set aside the orders under appeal, and remand the matter to the Tribunal to examine this question afresh in accordance with law.
The appeals are, accordingly, disposed of. Miscellaneous
petitions pending, if any, shall also stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J)
___________________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J)
13th July 2016 JSU THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
ITTA.No.652 & 658 of 2015
Date: 13.07.2016 JSU
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026