THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-III, HYDERABAD vs. M/S. VISAKHA INDUSTRIES LIMITED
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal held that Sales Tax and Excise Duty do not form part of the 'Total Turnover' for the purpose of deduction under Section 80HHC. This decision was based on a Supreme Court ruling.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against a decision concerning the deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act. The core issue was whether Sales Tax and Excise Duty should be included in the 'Total Turnover' for calculating this deduction.
What were the issues?
Whether Sales Tax and Excise Duty are includable in 'Total Turnover' for Section 80HHC deduction.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Lakshmi Machine Works163 citing290 ITR 667 · 2007 · SC · Read judgment
The Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy and The Hon’ble Sri Justice T.Amarnath Goud ITTA.No.164 of 2006 Dt: 02-01-2018 Between: The. Commissioner of Income Tax- III, Hyderabad ….Appellant and M/s.Visakha Industries Limited, Secunderabad ….Respondent
Counsel for the Appellant:
Mr.B.Narasimha Sharma
Counsel for the respondent:
Mr.A.Sanjay Kishore
The Court made the following:
CVNR, J & TA, J ITTA.No.164 of 2006 Dt: 02-01-2018
2 Judgment: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna R eddy)
The main question of law raised in this Appeal by the Revenue is, whether the Sales Tax and Excise Duty are part of "Total Turnover" for the purpose of deduction under Section 80 HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, 'the Act'), and liable to be excluded from the said Turnover for the purpose of deduction under the said provision.
At the hearing, Sri B.Narasimha Sharma, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department, has fairly submitted that in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lakshmi Machine Works1, the Supreme Court has held that the Excise Duty and Sales Tax do not partake of the character of Turnover and that therefore, they are not includable in the “Total Turnover” under Section 80 HHC (3) of the Act.
In the light of the aforesaid judgment, the substantial questions of law framed in this Appeal are answered against the Revenue.
The Appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
______________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J)
___________________ (T.Amarnath Goud, J) Date: 02-01-2018 lur
1 (2007) 290 ITR 667 (SC)
CVNR, J & TA, J ITTA.No.164 of 2006 Dt: 02-01-2018
More judgments on Section 80HHC
- Sheena Industries, Panipat vs ACIT Circle, PanipatITA 3076/DEL/2008[2004-2005]Status: Disposed26 May 2026AY 2004-2005
- Sarla Fashion Garments, New Delhi vs JCIT, Range-31, DelhiITA 1799/DEL/2006[2001-2002]Status: Disposed20 May 2026AY 2001-2002
- M/S Vardhman Textiles Ltd vs C I T and AnrITA/517/200826 Feb 2026
- C I T vs M/S Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Helathcare LtdITA/271/20095 Feb 2026
- CIT, Chandigarh vs M/S Hindustan Unilever LtdITA/677/20085 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ankil Jagdishchandra Kholwadwala vs. Union Of INDIA And AnrBombay · 22 Oct 2026
- Fasil Hussain Shah vs. Ut Of J And K Th Commissioner Secretary TO Government Finance Department And OthersJammu and Kashmir and Ladakh · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S. Devkinandan Traders vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- M/S Dixit Medical Agencies vs. State Of U.P. And AnotherAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026
- Sukant Kumar vs. Union Of INDIA And 6 OthersAllahabad · 21 Oct 2026