G.RAMANLAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court allowed the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The appellant sought withdrawal of the Income Tax Tribunal Appeal. The reason for withdrawal was to avail benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the appeal could be withdrawn by the appellant to avail benefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Between: G.Ramanlal, Prop:Balaji Jewellers, 748, AS Rao Nagar, Hyderabad' .,,APPELLANT AND lncome Tax Officer, Ward - 11 t4l, Hyderabad' lT Towers' AC Gaurds' Hyderabad ...RESPONDENT For the Appellant : SRI C.V.NARASIMHAM' Advocate For the Respondent : SRI B.NARASIMHA SARMA' Advocate The Court made the following: ORDER t HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDOY AND THE HONOURABLE DT' JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER LT.T.A. NO: 351 OF 2008 lncome Tax Tribunal Appeal under section 260-4 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961' against the order of the income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench'A', Bench Hyderabad in ITA No.948/Hydt2007, for assessment year 2000-2001 dated 29-08-2008 received by appellant on 2-9-2008 preferred against the Order of the Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals)-Vl, 3d Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad, Appeal No.0162/0607/lT0/ wD.11 (a)/hyd /clT(A)-vl/2007-08 dated 10-07-2007, preferred against the order of the lncome Tax Officer, ward-'l1(4), Hyderabad 31-03-2006 PAN/ GIR No. ACWPG4404E dated 31.03.2000
HONOTIR.{BLE SRI JUSTICE A. RAJASHEKER REDDY AND HONOURABLE DT.JUSTICE SHAMEEN,I AKTHER I.T.T.A. No.351 O F 2008 JUDGMENT i (pet Hon,bte Sri Justice a, Rajashek& Redrrdy) Learned counsel for the appellant has a filed a letter seeking withdrawal of this appeal on the ground that the appellanr wishes to avail the berrefits under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020, introduced by the Central Govemment. 2. In thar view of the matter, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. 3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. ,TRUE COPY// Sd/-M,SANTHI VARDHANI JOINT REGISTRAR t'+t SECTION OFFICER To . The Chairman, lncome Tax Appellate Tribunal' Hyderabad A Bench' Hyderabad , iii; 6;;;i;sibneior rncome-fax (Appeats)-Vl 3rd Floor, Aayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, HYderabad-500004' ' lxi iaa;i: ".1% 9xi:?:#.T3.1'i f J;iI3,T?3i11 e 1 . . 6;; dc ii 5ii s.Nirrti.ha Sarma, Advocate (oPUC) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. Two CD CoPies . One SPare CoPY s. ., d \
HIGH COURT DATED:1210812021 51A1 E OA )o !,\qls O 1t o *i '/,1,,. I a.': j)'' JUDGMENT ITTA.No.351 of 2008 Dismissing the Appeal as withdrawn' q] \ 4 \\.:'-:.
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026