COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA vs. BADU RURAL WELFARE SOCIETY FOUNDATION

PDF · subscribers
ITAT/54/2017HC CalcuttaWBCHCO000608201729 November 2021Bench: HON'BLE JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM,HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The revenue sought to withdraw the appeal based on a communication from the Income Tax Officer and a Supreme Court decision. The High Court accepted the withdrawal request.

What were the facts?

The revenue filed an appeal against an ITAT order concerning the denial of registration under Section 12AA(1) of the Income Tax Act. The core issue was whether the Commissioner's powers were limited to examining the charitable nature of objects or also included the genuineness of activities.

What were the issues?

Whether the Commissioner's power under Section 12AA(1) for granting registration extends to examining the genuineness of activities, not just the charitable nature of objects.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 12AA(1),Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

OD-1 ORDER SHEET ITAT/54/2017 IA NO: GA/1/2017 (Old No:GA/595/2017) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION), KOLKATA VS BADU RURAL WELFARE SOCIETY FOUNDATION BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM And The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 29TH November, 2021 Appearance: Mr. Radhamohan Ray, Adv. Mr. S. Lamba, Adv. …For the Appellant Mr. Tilak Mitra, Adv. …For the Respondent The Court : This appeal of the revenue filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act (the ‘Act’ in brevity) is directed against the order dated 30th September, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, B-Bench, Kolkata (the ‘Tribunal’) in ITA No.94 & 95/Kol/2016. The revenue has raised the following substantial question of law for consideration : “a) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench Kolkata erred in law in holding that for granting registration under Section 12AA(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 the powers of Commissioner of Income Tax are limited to “the aspect of examining that whether or not the objects of the trusts are charitable in nature” only without examining the genuineness of activities,

2 whereas by virtue of the provisions of Section 12AA(1) (a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Commissioner of Income Tax shall satisfy himself about the genuineness of activities?” We have heard Mr. Radhamohan Ray, learned standing counsel for the appellant/ revenue and Mr. Tilak Mitra, learned counsel for the respondent/assessee. The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue has placed before us the communication addressed to him from the Income Tax Officer (Exemptions) Kolkata dated 12th November, 2021 stating that this appeal has been filed in an issue of denial of registration under Section 12AA(1) of the Act due to lack of activities on the part of the trustees. Referring to the decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Ananda Social & Educational Trust Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax (2020) 114 Taxmann.com 693 (SC), the Department seeks to withdraw this appeal. The said submission made by the learned standing counsel based on the communication dated 12th November, 2021 is placed on record and the appeal stands dismissed. With the dismissal of the appeal, the stay application also stands dismissed. (T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.) S.Das/S.De

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →