THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. KAPIL DEV
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court found that the ITAT erred in assuming assessments for 1992-93 and 1993-94 were completed under Section 143(3). Since this factual error was apparent, the matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) passed a common order for assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1993-94. The ITAT's decision for 1992-93 and 1993-94 was based on the premise that assessments were completed under Section 143(3).
What were the issues?
Whether the ITAT correctly applied the proviso to Section 147 by incorrectly assuming the assessment for the years in question was completed under Section 143(3).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
ITA No. 1550 & 1553 of 2006
Page 1 of 3 * THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment delivered on: 21.08.2008
ITA Nos. 1550 & 1553/2006
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME
TAX DELHI (CENTRAL)-II
...... Appellant
-versus-
SHRI KAPIL DEV
..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Appellant
: Mr R. D. Jolly For the Respondent
: Mr S. Krishnan
CORAM :-
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
Whether the Reporters of local papers may
be allowed to see the judgment ?
To be referred to Reporters or not ? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported
in the Digest ?
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J (ORAL) 1.
These appeals are in respect of the assessment years 1992-93 and 1993-94 and arise out of the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 15.02.2006 in respect of the ITA
ITA No. 1550 & 1553 of 2006
Page 2 of 3 Nos. 4788 to 4789/Del/2003. The impugned order is a common order which also includes the assessment year 1991-92. The appeal against the assessment year 1991-92 being ITA no. 1563/2006 has been dismissed by this Court today itself by a separate order. 2.
However, we are taking a different approach in respect of the present appeal because there appears to be a mistake in Tribunal’s order with regard to the two years in question in these appeals. In paragraph No. 8 of the impugned order, it has been recorded that:- “It is not disputed that in all the three assessment years, the assessment had been completed under Section 143 (3) Income Tax Act, 1961, and therefore, in view of the proviso to Section 147, the assessment could be reopened only in case of assessee failed or to disclose the fully and truly all material facts necessary for his assessment…” 3.
It is an admitted position before this Court that in so far as the assessment years 1992-93 and 1993-94 are concerned there was no assessment under Section 143 (3) of the Act. The only assessment under Section 143 (3) was in respect of the assessment year 1991-92. The Tribunal seems to have overlooked this fact and has based its decision purely on the ground that the assessment had
ITA No. 1550 & 1553 of 2006
Page 3 of 3 been completed under Section 143 (3) of the Act in respect of the assessment years 1992-93 and 1993-94 also. Since this error is apparent and the learned counsel for the parties have fairly stated that no such assessment has been done in respect of the years in question in these appeals, we feel that it would be appropriate that the matter with regard to these years is remitted to the Tribunal for consideration afresh. 4.
Consequently, we dispose of these appeals and direct that the Tribunal shall consider the appeals filed by the Revenue for the assessment years 1992-93 and 1993-94 afresh.
BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
August 21, 2008 mk
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Commissioner/Additional Commissioner Of Central Tax vs. M/S INDIA Agro Exports Private LimitedKarnataka · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026