COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. P.C. JAIN (HUF)

Whether reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

These two appeals arise out of the common order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 22nd April, 2009 pertaining to the assessment year 2001-02 and in respect of two appeals, one by the Revenue and one by the assessee in ITA No.2138/Del./2008 and 1326/Del/2008 respectively, filed before the said Tribunal.

In the assessee’s appeal one of the points taken was that the warrant of authorization had been issued by the Additional Director of Income Tax (Investigation) who was not authorized to issue such a search

The Tribunal, following the decision of this Court in the cases of Dr. Nalini Mahajan & Others vs. Director of Income Tax (Investigation) & Others:257 ITR 123, CIT vs. Pawan Kumar Garg in ITA No.881/2008 decided on 16th January, 2009 and Prem Gandhi in ITA No.90/2009 decided on 2nd March, 2009 accepted the plea taken by the assessee and held that the Additional Director of Income Tax (Investigation) was not authorized to issue the search warrant and consequently the search warrant became invalid as did the assessment which followed thereafter. In view of the fact that the entire proceedings were held to be invalid, the other grounds taken by the assessee in his appeal were not gone into by the Tribunal. Similarly, the Revenue’s appeal was also not examined because the assessment itself had been quashed on the first ground taken by the assessee before the Tribunal.

The learned counsel for the Revenue now points out before this Court that by virtue of The Finance (No.2) Act, 2009, an amendment has been introduced in Section 132(1) with retrospective effect from 1st June, 1994 whereby the Additional Director has also been empowered to issue warrants of authorization. In view of this amendment, the impugned order is liable to be set aside and the matter is to be remitted to the

Consequently, we set aside the impugned order and remit the matter back to the Tribunal with the direction that the Revenue’s appeal before the Tribunal gets revived and so does the assessee’s appeal before the Tribunal on all the other points originally urged before the Tribunal.

The appeals stand disposed of on these terms.