RAMASAMY KANDASAMY,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, WARD-1,, NAMAKKAL

PDF · subscribers
ITA 1954/CHNY/2024Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 September 2024AY 2011-123 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal, considering the principle of natural justice and the assessee's negligence, restored the assessment to the Assessing Officer. This is subject to the assessee depositing Rs. 5,000/- to the Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority within 30 days.

What were the facts?

The assessee failed to appear before the lower authorities, leading to an assessment on a best judgment basis. The Assessing Officer added Rs. 14.79 Lacs representing cash deposits, which was confirmed by the CIT(A). The assessee is appealing this decision.

What were the issues?

Whether the assessment made on a best judgment basis without the assessee's participation should be set aside to allow the assessee to present their case, upholding principles of natural justice.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, CHENNAI

Before: HONBLE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & HONBLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM

Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)

1.

Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2011-12 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 12-03-2024 in the matter of assessment framed by the Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) on best judgment basis u/s 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act on 29-11-2019. The Registry has noted delay of 72 days in the appeal, the condonation of which has been sought by the assessee on the strength of affidavit of the assessee. Considering the period of delay, we condone the delay and proceed for adjudication of the appeal on merits. The limited payer of Ld. AR is to send back the matter back to the file of lower authorities which has been opposed by Ld. Sr. DR.

2.

In the assessment order, Ld. AO made addition of Rs.14.79 Lacs being cash deposited by the assessee in bank accounts. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the same since the assessee failed to appear before any of the lower authorities. Aggrieved, the assessee is in further appeal before us.

3.

Though the assessee has remained negligent in substantiating its case, however, keeping in mind the principle of natural justice, we accept the prayer of Ld. AR and restore the assessment back to the file of Ld. AO. The same would come at a cost of Rs.5,000/- which shall be deposited by the assessee within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order to 'Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority' at Hon'ble High Court of Madras. The proof of the same shall be furnished by the assessee to learned AO who shall proceed for framing of assessment afresh. The assessee is directed to substantiate its case forthwith.

4.

The appeal stand allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 24th September, 2024 (ABY T. VARKEY) NYAYIK SADASYA / JUDICIAL MEMBER चेन्नई Chennai; दिनांक Dated :24-09-2024 DS (MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL) LEKH SADASYA / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →