COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-IV vs. INFOGAIN INDIA PVT. LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA/487/2014HC DelhiDLHC01118694201417 September 2015Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court held that the issue was covered by its previous decisions in similar cases involving deductions under Section 10A, which is in pari materia with Section 10B. Therefore, the ITAT's decision was upheld.

What were the facts?

The Revenue appealed against the ITAT's decision to uphold the deletion of additions made on account of deductions claimed under Section 10B of the Act. The assessee had claimed deductions under Section 80HHE.

What were the issues?

Whether the ITAT erred in allowing deductions under Section 10B when the assessee had claimed deductions under Section 80HHE, considering the similarity of Section 10A and 10B.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10B,Section 80HHE,Section 260A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

7 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 2 + ITA 485/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX —IV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing counsel. versus INFOGAIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Salil Kapoor with Mr. Sanat Kapoor and Mr. Shubham Rastogi, Advocates. And y + ITA 487/2014 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX —IV .....Appellant Through: Mr. Kamal Sawhney, Senior standing counsel with Mr. Raghvendra Singh, Junior Standing counsel. versus INFOGAIN INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Saul Kapoor with Mr. Sanat Kapoor and Mr. Shubham Rastogi, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR HON'BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU ORDER % 17.09.2015 ITA Nos. 485/2014 & 487/2014 Page 1 of 3 Digitally Signed By:AMULYA Signature Not Verified

These appeals, being ITA No. 485 of 2014 and ITA No. 487 of 2014, by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act') are directed against the impugned orders dated 29th November 2013 and 3lS January 2014 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ('ITAT') in ITA Nos.2339/Del/2010 and 5720/Del/2010 for the Assessment Years 2005-06 and 2006-07 respectively. The issue that is urged for consideration is whether the ITAT has erred in upholding the deletion of the addition on account of the deduction claimed under section lOB of the Act amounting to Rs. 5,88,28,278 and Rs. 7,03,87,701 although the Respondent Assessee had been claiming deduction under Section 80HHE of the Act? It is not disputed that the above issue stands covered in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue by the decisions of this Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Infra Soft Technologies Limited (decision dated 21" October 2010 in ITA No. 708 of 2008) and Commissioner of Income Tax v. Interra Software India Limited (2011) 238 CTR (Del) 23. In both decisions the deduction claimed was under Section 10A of the Act which is inpari materia Section lOB of the Act. ITA Nos. 485/2014 & 487/2014 Page2of3

4.

These appeals are accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J ~ - VIBHU BAKHRU, J SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 Rk ITA Nos. 485/2014 & 487/2014 Page 3 of 3

More judgments on Section 10B

All 1,217 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10B →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →