ABUSHA INVESTMENT & MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLP,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NON CORP CIRCLE 7(1), CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had offered dividend income of Rs.70.15 Lacs to tax as income from other sources, with taxes paid as per Section 115BBDA. Since no expenditure or losses were claimed against this income, and taxes were paid according to the statute, no disallowance under Section 14A could be made.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal for Assessment Year 2018-19 against the order of the CIT(A) which confirmed the disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act. The assessee had received dividend income and claimed an exemption of Rs.10 Lacs, which was voluntarily disallowed in the computation of income.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A is sustainable when dividend income is offered to tax under Section 115BBDA and no expenses are claimed against it.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 115BBDA,Section 8D(2)(ii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “C” BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: HON’BLE SHRI ABY T. VARKEY, JM & HON’BLE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR AGGARWAL, AM
(िनधा*रणवष* / Assessment Year: 2018-19) Abusha Investment & Management DCIT बनाम/ Services LLP Non Corporate Circle -7(1), 27, MylaiRamhanathan Street, Chennai. Vs. Thyagaraja Nagar,Chennai – 600 017. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./TAN/GIR No.AAZFA-6631-N (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) : (� थ� / Respondent) अपीलाथ�कीओरसे/ Appellant by : Shri Ajith Kumar Chordia (CA) – Ld.AR � थ�कीओरसे/Respondent by : Ms. R. Anita (Addl.CIT) -Ld. Sr. DR सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date of Hearing : 26-09-2024 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 09-10-2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manoj Kumar Aggarwal (Accountant Member)
Aforesaid appeal by assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19 arises out of the order of learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi [CIT(A)] dated 09-05-2024 in the matter of an assessment framed by the Ld.AO u/s.143(3) r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30-04-2021. The sole grievance of the assessee is confirmation of disallowance u/s 14A for Rs.403.78 Lacs.
The Ld. AR advanced arguments and submitted that there is no exempt income earned by the assessee and Ld. AO erred in noting the correct facts. The Ld. Sr. DR justified the addition and drew attention to the provisions of Sec. 115BBDA (2) providing that no expenditure shall be allowed in computing income by way of dividend. The written submissions have been filed in this regard. Having heard rival submissions and upon perusal of case records, our adjudication would be as under.
The assessee received dividend of Rs.80.15 Lacs and claimed amount of Rs.10 Lacs to be exempt. The Ld. AO proceeded to compute disallowance u/s 14A. The assessee submitted that dividend income became chargeable to tax in this year vide Sec. 115BBDA. The deduction of Rs.10 Lacs was claimed as per this Section only but the same has also been voluntarily disallowed in the computation of income. However, rejecting the same, Ld. AO applied Rule 8D and computed disallowance of Rs.413.78 Lacs u/r 8D(2)(ii) @ 1% of annual average of monthly averages of opening and closing value of the investment. After adjusting voluntary disallowance of Rs.10 Lacs, the amount of Rs.403.78 Lacs was added to the income of the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the same except verification of computations by Ld. AO. Aggrieved the assessee is in further appeal before us.
From assessee’s computation of income as placed on record, it could be seen that the assessee has offered dividend income of Rs.70.15 Lacs to tax as income from other sources. It could also be seen that the amount in excess of Rs.10 Lacs i.e., Rs.70.15 Lacs has been offered to tax @10% and due taxes has been paid on the same in terms of Sec.115BBDA. It is evident that the assessee has not claimed any expenditure or losses against this income. The taxes have been paid as per computation mechanism as provided under the statute. Therefore, no case of disallowance u/s 14A could be made out against the assessee. Hence, we delete the impugned disallowance. 5. The appeal stand allowed in terms of our above order. Order pronounced on 9th October, 2024
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Mehra Mac Industries Private Limited vs. The Deputy State Tax OfficerTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- Santosh Das And Anr. vs. Union Of INDIACalcutta · 30 Oct 2026