THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BHURUKA GASES
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court acknowledged the joint submission of both parties. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed without further elaboration on the merits.
What were the facts?
The Income Tax Department appealed an order from the ITAT. Both parties agreed that no substantial question of law arose for determination by the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether a substantial question of law arises for consideration by the High Court in an appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR ITA NO.168/2014
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU.
2.THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER WARD -11(1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU. ..APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/s.BHURUKA GASES HOLDINGS PVT. LTD., NO.48, LAVELLE ROAD, BENGALURU-560001. .. RESPONDENT
(BY SMT.JINITHA CHATERJEE, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.S.PARTHASARATHI, ADVOCATE)
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO:
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AS STATED IN THE APPEAL.
ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.899/BANG/2013 DATED:28/11/2013 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -11(1), BANGALORE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J, DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.
Learned counsel for the parties have jointly stated that in view of the Judgment of this court in ITA 120/2011 – M/s.Bhoruka Engineering Inds. Ltd., Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax decided on
09.04.2013, no substantial question of law arises in this appeal for determination by this court.
As such, appeal is dismissed.
No order as to costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SBN
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Ganesh Trimbak Saraf And Another vs. The State Of Maharashtra And AnotherBombay · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Monolith Resorts Private Limited vs. The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026