THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S. KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the questions of law in the present appeal were covered by its prior decision in a similar case concerning the same assessee. Therefore, no substantial question of law arose for determination.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed an ITAT order concerning the assessee, Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. The appeal involved questions of law similar to those previously decided by the High Court in another case involving the same assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether substantial questions of law arise for determination when the issues are covered by a previous High Court judgment in a case involving the same assessee.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
ITA NO. 122/2015
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,
BANGALORE.
THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,
CIRCLE-11(5),
RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN,
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE – 560 001. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND , ADV. A/W E.I.SANMATHI, ADV.)
AND
M/S. KARNATAKA POWER CORPORATION LTD., (PERTAINING TO ERSTWHILE M/S VISVESVARAYA VIDYUTH NIGAMA LTD.,) SHAKTHI BHAVAN, NO.82, RACE COURSE ROAD, BANGALORE – 560 001. PAN: ADKPK6179R ...RESPONDENT
THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SEC.260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED: 28.11.2014 PASSED IN ITA NO.84/BANG/2013, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006. PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE, CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(5), BANGALORE.
THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
We have heard Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the records.
It is not disputed that the questions involved in this appeal are covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax -vs- M/s Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (ITA Nos.404 & 405/2014) decided on 13.07.2015 wherein, in the case of the same assessee for different assessment years, similar questions were involved and have been answered in favour of the assessee.
As such, in view of the aforesaid judgment dated 13.07.2015, we are of the opinion that no substantial question of law arises for determination by this Court.
The appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Smt Usha W/O Shri Tarun vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- Ajay Kumar @ Ajay Sharma vs. Union Of INDIA Rep Thr The Intelligence Officer, Directorate General Of GST Intelligence (Dggi)Jharkhand · 29 Oct 2026
- Korba Steel Castings vs. State Of ChhattisgarhChhattisgarh · 29 Oct 2026