THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S SOMAVAMSHA
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court held that the question involved in this appeal was covered by a previous decision of the same court. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Commissioner of Income-Tax filed an appeal against an order of the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal raised substantial questions of law that warranted consideration by the High Court, given a prior binding precedent.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 08TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B MANOHAR ITA No.236 OF 2015 (IT)
BETWEEN :
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX C R BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD, BANGALORE.
THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3), UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE, MISSION ROAD, BANGALORE-560 027.
... APPELLANTS
(By Sri. : K V ARAVIND, ADV. )
2 AND
M/S SOMAVAMSHA SAHASRARJUNA KSHATRIYA SOCIETY LTD, NO.43, G K TEMPLE STREET, CHICKPET CROSS, BANGLAORE-560 053. ... RESPONDENT
This ITA is filed under Sec.260-A of Income Tax Act 1961, arising out of order dated: 16/12/2014 passed in ITA No. 1010/Bang/2014, for the Assessment Year- 2010-2011, praying this Hon'ble Court to:
Formulate the substantial questions of law stated above.
Allow the appeal and set aside the orders passed by the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore in ITA No. 1010/Bang/*2014, Dated 16/12/2014 and confirm the order of the Appellate Commissioner confirming the order passed by the Income Tax Officer, Ward-5(3), Bangalore.
To pass such other suitable orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case in the interest of justice and equity.
This appeal is coming on for admission this day, VINEET SARAN, J. delivered the following:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri.,K.V.Aravind, learned counsel for the appellants and perused the records.
The question involved in this appeal is covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax V/S Sri.Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha Bagalkot in ITA No.5006/2013 decided on 05-02-2014.
In the light of the aforesaid judgment, this appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE mpk/-*
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026