THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. THE MANGALORE CO OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD.,
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court acknowledged that the questions involved were covered by its previous decisions in favor of the assessee. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed against an ITAT order that confirmed the orders of the Appellate Commissioner and Income Tax Officer. The appeal involved questions of law already decided by the High Court.
What were the issues?
Whether the High Court's previous decisions on similar matters should be applied to the present appeal.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
ITA NO.490/2015
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
C R BUILDING
ATTAVARA
MANGALORE-575 001.
THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER
WARD-1(2)
C R BUILDING, ATTAVARA
MANGALORE-575 001.
…APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K V, ADV.)
AND
THE MANGALORE CO-OPERATIVE BUILDING SOCIETY LTD., CLASSIC ARCADE K S RAO ROAD MANGALORE- 575 001. …RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION.260- A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.1615/ BANG / 2014 DATED: 08.05.2015 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD- 1(2), MANGALORE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Heard Sri K V Aravind, learned Counsel for the appellants and perused the records.
Learned Counsel for the Appellants does not dispute that the questions involved in this appeal are covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Sri Biluru Gurubasava Pattina Sahakari Sangha Niyamitha Bagalkot in ITA No.5006/2013 decided on 05.02.2014 and in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Mangalore Co-operative Building Society Ltd., in ITA
3 No.146/2015 decided on 29.9.2015, wherein the question raised in such appeals have been answered in favour of assessee and against the revenue.
Accordingly, this appeal stands dismissed and the questions raised in these appeals are also answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
AN/-
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Maruti Nandan Minetech Private Limited vs. The Joint CommissionerRajasthan · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Rentex Polymers Private Limited vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Services TaxDelhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Shila Traders vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S Ashish Enterprises vs. Assistant Commissioner Gsto Ward No. 86Delhi · 29 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bhanwal Trading And Company vs. The Union Of INDIARajasthan · 28 Oct 2026