Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
ITA NO.24/2012 BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
C R BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE-11(2), C R BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE. …APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K V ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND
M/S. COCO LATEX EXPORTS PVT., LTD., NO.7, FIRST MAIN VASANTHNAGAR BANGALORE-560 052. ….RESPONDENT
(BY SRI THOMAS VELLA PALLY AND SRI MITHUN MARKOS, ADVs.)
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION.260- A OF I.T.ACT,1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE IN ITA NO.758/BANG/2011 DATED 13/09/2011 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-11(2), BANGALORE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The questions involved in this appeal are covered by the decision of this Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs Tata Elxi Limited (2012) 349 ITR 98. In the light of the aforesaid judgment, this appeal stands dismissed.
However, it is submitted by learned Counsel for the appellants that against the judgment of this Court, an appeal is filed to the Apex Court and is pending consideration.
In the event of the Apex Court reversing the judgment of this Court, the assessing authority shall pass consequential orders in terms of Section
3 260(1A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in conformity with the outcome of the appeal before the Supreme Court.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
AN/-