No AI summary yet for this case.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA
ITA NO.320/2015
BETWEEN
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
C.R. BUILDING
ATTAVARA
MANGALORE – 575 001
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE – 2[1]
ATTAVARA
MANGALORE – 575 001 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI K.V. ARAVIND, ADV. & MS. PREETHI J.D., ADV.,)
AND
SHRI. SOLTHADY PREMANATH ‘SHREYAS’, BEHIND BC CENTRE B.C. ROAD, JODUMARGA BANTWAL – 574 219
…RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260- A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ITAT,
2 BANGALORE, IN ITA NO.72/BANG/2014 DATED 20.2.2015 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE – 2[1], MANGALORE.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, VINEET SARAN J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants-Revenue has placed before us a recent Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Central Board of Direct taxes, wherein the monetary limit of the tax effect for filing appeals before the High Court has been enhanced from Rs.10 lacs to Rs.20 lacs. In paragraph-10 of the said Circular, it has been clarified that the same will apply retrospectively to pending appeals also, which, if below the specified tax limits, may be withdrawn/not pressed.
Learned counsel for the appellants has stated that the tax effect in the present appeal is below the specified limit of Rs.20 lacs.
Accordingly, in view of the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015, the tax effect in this appeal being less than Rs.20 lacs, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
AN/-