THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S THE SHAMRAO VITHAL
What did the High Court hold?
The Tribunal's decision was upheld, following a High Court judgment that relied on a Ministry of Finance circular. The circular clarified that co-operative banks were not required to deduct tax on interest paid to members on time deposits before June 1, 2015.
What were the facts?
The Revenue appealed a Tribunal order holding that a Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax on interest paid to its members. This was based on an exemption under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act.
What were the issues?
Whether a co-operative bank is exempt from deducting tax on interest paid to its members on time deposits before June 1, 2015.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: AND
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH ON THE 05th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2016 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL No.629 OF 2015 BETWEEN: 1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX TDS, GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA-DE-OUREM, PANAJI-GAO-403 001 2. THE INCOME -TAX OFFICER TDS WARD(1), C.R BUILDING, ANNEXE,P.B. ROAD, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025 ... APPELLANTS (By Sri. Y.V.RAVIRAJ ADV.) AND: M/S THE SHAMRAO VITHAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., GROUND FLOR, SATELLITE SPACE AGE COMPLEX, KOPPIKAR ROAD, HUBLI PAN:AAAAT 0177C ... RESPONDENT THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDERS DATED 30.06.2015, PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE, IN ITA
: 2 : NO.673/BANG/2015, CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDS), HUBBALLI, ETC.,. THIS ITA COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J. DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: JUDGMENT Revenue, with a question of law as to whether Tribunal was correct in holding that a Co-operative Bank was not required to deduct tax on the interest paid to the members on the ground that they were exempt under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for brevity, ‘the Act’) has presented this appeal. A Division Bench of this Court in I.T.A. No.100180/2015 vide its judgment dated 17.08.2016 by placing reliance on the circular bearing No.19/2015 in F. No.142/14/2015 TPL issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, has held that the Co- operative Bank was not required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on Time Deposits of its members paid or credited on or before 01.06.2015. The relevant portion of the circular reads as follows : “42.5 In view of this, the provisions of the section 194(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act have been amended so as to expressly provide that the exemption provided from deduction of tax from payment of interest to
: 3 : members by a co-operative society under Section 194A(3)(v) of the Income-tax Act shall not apply to the payment of interest on time deposits by the co-operative banks to its members. As this amendment is effective from the prospective date of 1st June, 2015, the co-operative bank shall be required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on time deposits of its members, on or after the 1st June 2015. Hence, a cooperative bank was not required to deduct tax from the payment of interest on time deposits of its members paid or credited before 1st June 2015.” 2. The grievance of the revenue is with regard to a finding recorded by the Tribunal that the Co-operative Banks were never required to deduct tax on the interest paid. The said issue is no more res integra and settled in the aforementioned judgment dated 17.8.2016 in ITA No.100180/2015. Therefore, this appeal fails and is accordingly dismissed. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE RK/-
More judgments on Section 194A(3)(v)
- The Vijapur Taluka Co-Operative Purchase… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, PatanITA 925/AHD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed5 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO(TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7429/MUM/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2017-18
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7428/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7427/MUM/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- ITO (TDS)-1(2)(1), Mumbai vs Dattatray Maharaj Kalambe Jaoli Sah. Bank…ITA 7426/MUM/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2019-20
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026