THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX vs. M/S NDS LIMITED- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted that the question of law raised in the appeal had been answered against the appellants in a previous case. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the Director of Income-Tax against an order of the ITAT. The appeal was listed for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections.
What were the issues?
The substantial question of law raised in the appeal was already decided against the revenue by the High Court in a similar case.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd.818 citing349 ITR 98 · 2012 · HC
ITA No.419/2015
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.H.G.RAMESH ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.419/2015
BETWEEN :
THE DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX
INTERNATIONAL TAXATION RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE-560 001
THE DY.DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE-1(1), RASHTROTHANA BHAVAN NRUPATHUNGA ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI DILIP FOR SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATES)
AND :
M/S NDS LIMITED-INDIA BRANCH OFFICE NO.9, ASHFORD PARK VIEW 80 FT. ROAD, KORAMANGALA III BLOCK BANGALORE – 560 034
...RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AND TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 20.03.2015 PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU
ITA No.419/2015
-2-
IN ITA NO.1515/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-2007.
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Ag.CJ (Oral):
This appeal is listed today for orders regarding non compliance of office objection raised on the appeal. However, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the question of law raised in this appeal is answered against the appellants by this Court in CIT v. Tata Elxsi Ltd. [(2012) 349 ITR 98 (Karn)]. IA No.2/2017 filed for condonation of the delay in filing the appeal and the appeal are accordingly dismissed. Appeal dismissed.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
More judgments on Section 260-A
- Rijwan vs Income Tax OfficerITA/3/202023 Sept 2026
- Manoj Gupta vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)…ITA/243/202618 Sept 2026
- Rajesh Kumar Gupta vs Income Tax Officer, JammuITA/20/20142 Apr 2026
- Late Shri Gopaliyengar Madabushi Muralidhar vs The Income Tax OfficerITA/16/202526 Feb 2026
- Shri K. Samba Siva Rao ( HUF), Hyd vs I.T.O., HydITTA/181/20109 Feb 2026
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sutlej Textiles And Industries Limited vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S. Ut Corp vs. Union Of INDIARajasthan · 26 Oct 2026
- Sunrise Engineering vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026