Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
1/4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF JUNE 2018
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI
AND
THE HON’BLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SUJATHA
I.T.A. No.465/2017 c/w I.T.A. No.466/2017
IN I.T.A.No.465/2017:
BETWEEN :
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT (A), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANAGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, RANGE-1, 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANAGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/S. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD., 4TH FLOOR, OLD MADRAS ROAD BENGALURU-560016.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI PRASHANTH SHIVADASS, ADV. FOR SRI ADITYA V. BHAT, ADV.)
Date of Judgment 19-06-2018, ITA No.465/2017 & connected matter
The Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT(A) & another Vs. M/s. Google India Pvt. Ltd.,
2/4
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER PASSED IN S.P.NO.74/BANG/2017 (IN ITA NO.1190/BANG/2014), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 PRAYING TO 1. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN SP NO.74/BANG/2017 (IN ITA NO.1190/BANG/2014) DATED 31/03/2017. 3. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
IN I.T.A.No.466/2017:
THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIT (A), INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE-1(2), 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU-560095.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
M/S. GOOGLE INDIA PVT. LTD., No.3, RMZ INFINITY, TOWER E, 4TH FLOOR, OLD MADRAS ROAD BENGALURU-560016.
…RESPONDENT
(BY SRI PRASHANTH SHIVADASS, ADV. FOR SRI ADITYA V. BHAT, ADV.)
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER PASSED IN S.P.NO.256/BANG/2016 (IN ITA NO.1190/BANG/2014), FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-2014 PRAYING TO 1.
Date of Judgment 19-06-2018, ITA No.465/2017 & connected matter
The Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT(A) & another Vs. M/s. Google India Pvt. Ltd.,
3/4
FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE. 2. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BENGALURU IN SP NO.256/BANG/2016 (IN ITA NO.1190/BANG/2014) DATED 23/12/2016. 3. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, Dr. VINEET KOTHARI, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
J U D G M E N T
Mr. K.V.Aravind, Adv. for Appellants - Revenue Mr. Prashanth Shivadass, Adv. for Mr.Aditya V.Bhat, Respondent - Assessee
Learned Counsel at the Bar had brought to our notice that the present Appeals have been filed by the Revenue arising from the interlocutory order passed by the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on stay applications filed by the Respondent-Assessee, extending the period of stay since the appeal itself could not be decided within the statutory period for which stay could be granted by the learned Tribunal u/s. 254 (2A) of the Act.
Date of Judgment 19-06-2018, ITA No.465/2017 & connected matter
The Commissioner of Income-tax, CIT(A) & another Vs. M/s. Google India Pvt. Ltd.,
4/4
The impugned order was passed by the learned Tribunal on Stay Applications on 31.03.2017 in ITA No.465/2017 and 23.12.2016 in ITA No.466/2017, but now during the pendency of the present Appeals before this Court, the main appeals also have been decided recently by the learned Tribunal on 11.05.2018. The copy of the Order passed by the learned Tribunal disposing of the Appeals of the Assessee are placed on record.
In view of the aforesaid, the present Appeals filed by the Revenue arising from interlocutory order passed by the Tribunal have been rendered infructuous and the same are accordingly disposed of as infructuous. No costs. Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE ln