INCOME TAX OFFICER(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), WARD-1(2), CHENNAI, GREAMS ROAD, CHENNAI vs. JEETH ANAND, CHENNAI
Facts
The Revenue filed an appeal against the deletion of salary income addition by the CIT(A). The assessee, a Non-Resident, received salary for services rendered in Thailand but the AO added it as salary received in India. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, considering the DTAA between India and Thailand.
Held
The Tribunal held that as per Article 15(1) of the India-Thailand DTAA, the salary income is taxable in Thailand. The DTAA provisions override the Act, and therefore, the CIT(A) correctly deleted the addition.
Key Issues
Whether salary income earned by a Non-Resident for services rendered in Thailand is taxable in India, considering the DTAA between the two countries?
Sections Cited
143, 144C, Article 15(1) of India Thailand DTAA
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH
आदेश / O R D E R
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the Revenue for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, CIT(A), Chennai-16 [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] dated 05.03.2024 in the matter of assessment framed by the Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 143 r.w.s 144C of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) on 28.04.2022.
ITA No.1422/Chny/2024 :- 2 -:
The effective ground of appeal in this appeal of Revenue is
against deleting the addition of salary income of Rs. 46,66,022/- made
by the A.O in the assessment order.
The assessee is an employee of M/s. FIS Global Business
Solutions India Pvt. Ltd. and has been Non-Resident during the year.
The assessee has received salary of Rs. 49,85,854/- for the services
rendered in Thailand and has claimed it non taxable in India in the
return of income. However, the A.O has made the addition of salaried
income as salary has been received in India. On appeal, the Ld.
CIT(A) has deleted the addition as the income has already offered in
Thailand and as per DTAA between India and Thailand the taxing right
has been given to Thailand under Article 15(1) of India Thailand
DTAA.
The Ld. Departmental Representative (DR) supporting the order
of A.O has argued that the salary has been received in India and
therefore, is taxable in India.
The Ld. Authorized Representative (A.R) of the assessee, on the
other hand supported the order of Ld. CIT(A) and argued that the
assessee is Non-Resident and the salary income has been offered in
ITA No.1422/Chny/2024 :- 3 -:
Thailand and as per Article 15(1) of DTAA between India and Thailand
,the income is taxable in Thailand and therefore, the Ld. CIT(A) has
correctly deleted the addition. The Ld. AR has also relied on the order
of Co-ordinate Bench of this Tribunal in the case of Shri Ramesh
Kumar AE vs. ITO in IT(TP)A No.51/Chny/2018 dated 11.08.2023 and
other cases where on similar facts , the salary income has been held
to be not taxable in India on the basis of DTAA.
We have heard the rival submissions, and perused the materials
available on record. The assessee is a Non-Resident and has received
salary of Rs. 49,85,854/- in India for the services rendered in Thailand.
The Ld. CIT(A) has held that the income has been offered in Thailand
and as per DTAA between India and Thailand, the salary income is
taxable in Thailand as articles of DTAA overrides the provisions of the
Act which has been the basis for the A.O to charge the income. The
Co-ordinate Bench in the case of Nanthakumar Murugesan v. ITO
[2024] 165 taxmann.com 304 (Chennai-Trib.) on similar facts has held
that where assessee, NRI, an employee of a company in India, was
seconded on overseas assignment to China by his employer and he
received salary for services rendered in China, since said income as
offered to tax in China and assessee had not claimed any foreign tax
ITA No.1422/Chny/2024 :- 4 -:
credit in any of jurisdiction, same would be exempt in India in light of DTAA. In view of the above, we find no infirmity in the order of Ld. CIT(A) and therefore, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed.
Order pronounced on 30th October, 2024.
Sd/- Sd/- (एबी टी. वक�) (जगदीश) (Jagadish) (ABY. T. Varkey) लेखा सद! /Accountant Member �ाियक सद! / Judicial Member चे�नई/Chennai, �दनांक/Dated: 30th October, 2024. EDN/-
आदेश क� �ितिल�प अ�े�षत/Copy to: 1. अपीलाथ�/Appellant 2. ��थ�/Respondent 3. आयकर आयु�/CIT, Chennai 4. िवभागीय �ितिनिध/DR 5. गाड� फाईल/GF
