RAJ KUMAR HUF,HISAR vs. ITO WARD 1, HISAR

PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JM:

This assessee’s appeal ITA no. 6761/Del/2025 for assessment year
2015-16 arises against CIT(A)/ NFAC, Delhi’s order dated 09.09.2025 (DIN &
Order No. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2025-26/1080478715(1), in proceedings u/s 147 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, hereinafter referred to as the ‘Act’.

Heard both the parties. Case file perused

2
2. It emerges at the outset during the course of hearing that the learned CIT(A)/NFAC’s detailed discussion in para 5 of the lower appellate order has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee thereby affirming the Assessing Officer’s action making the corresponding disallowances/additions herein.
3. Learned DR vehemently argues during the course of hearing in support of CIT(A)’s finding that the assessee had not filed any explanation or evidence supporting it’s case and therefore, his instant appeal deserves to be dismissed.
4. This tribunal has given thoughtful consideration to the foregoing rival stand and is of the considered view that since the CIT(A) has proceeded ex-parte against the assessee, possibility of some communication gaps between the taxpayer and the arguing counsel involving the newly introduced system of faceless hearings, could not be altogether ruled out.
5. Faced with this situation, in the larger interest of justice, this tribunal deem it appropriate to restore the assessee’s instant appeal back to the CIT(A)/NFAC for it’s afresh appropriate adjudication, within three effective opportunities subject to a rider that the taxpayer

3
shall plead and prove the case at his own risk and responsibility, in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly.
6. This assessee’s appeal is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in open court on 27.11.2025. (SATBEER SINGH GODARA)

JUDICIAL MEMBER
Dated: 28.11.2025. *MP*