No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.508 OF 2017
BETWEEN:
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-6
BMTC COMPLEX
KORMANGALA
BENGALURU.
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX
CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(2)
BENGALURU.
… APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.JEEVAN J.NEERALGI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.E.I.SANMATHI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI.H.S.ABDUL HAFEEZ SAYEED PROPRIETOR: M/S.ORIENTAL GRANITES
NO.6410, A-1-HABEED SHANKARMUTT ROAD HASSAN PAN: AELPS 6817 A
…RESPONDENT
THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 13.01.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.42/BANG/2014, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO DECIDE THE FOREGOING QUESTION OF LAW AND/OR SUCH OTHER QUESTIONS OF LAW AS MAY BE FORMULATED BY THE HON’BLE COURT AS DEEMED FIT AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 13.01.2017 PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, ‘B’ BENCH, BENGALURU AS SOUGHT FOR, IN THE RESPONDENT-ASSESSEE’S CASE, IN APPEAL PROCEEDINGS IN ITA NO.42/BANG/2014 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 AND GRANT SUCH OTHER RELIEF AS DEEMED FIT, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
*****
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of
2018 dated 11.07.2018 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE
Prs*