PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -9 vs. M/S W N S MORTGAGE SERVICES PVT LTD.

PDF · subscribers
ITA/807/2017HC DelhiDLHC01335294201730 January 2018Bench: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA2 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court confirmed the ITAT's decision, finding that call centre services are covered under Explanation 2(b) to Section 10A, which includes services of a similar nature to customized electronic data.

What were the facts?

The assessee provided call centre services, and the Assessing Officer denied deduction under Section 10A, stating it was not export of software. The CIT(A) and ITAT allowed the deduction, relying on Explanation 2(b) to Section 10A and a CBDT notification.

What were the issues?

Whether call centre services qualify as export of software eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 10A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

$~40

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +

ITA 807/2017

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-9 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar with Mr. Deepak Anand, Jr. Standing Counsel.

versus

M/S W N S MORTGAGE SERVICES PVT LTD. ..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Mayank Nagi, Advocate.

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA

O R D E R %

30.01.2018

The question of law urged is whether the activity of the assessee in providing call centre services to its principals is eligible for deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Assessing Officer initially brought to tax but denied the benefit under Section 10A holding that call centre services did not amount to export of software. The CIT (A) accepted the assessee’s contention that software services were covered by virtue of Explanation 2 (b) to Section 10A. The CBDT’s Notification No.890 (E) issued on 26.09.2000 expressly notifies call centres as activities covered by the Explanation.

Having regard to these facts, the ITAT confirmed the order of ITA 807/2017

Page 1 of 2

the CIT (A).

This Court has considered a similar issue in CIT v. Kiran Kapoor, 372 ITR 321 (Del.). Likewise in respect of the same assessee for the subsequent year - AY 2007-08 - the Court confirmed the view of the ITAT (ITA 91/2018, dated 29.01.2018). The Court is also cognizant of Section 10A, particularly Explanation 2, which in its material particulars define computer software as follows: - (a) Any computer program recorded on any disc, tape, perforated media or other information storage device or”

(b) Any customized electronic data or any product or service of similar nature.

In the above view of the matter, no substantial question of law arises; the appeal is, therefore, dismissed.

The date previously fixed is hereby recalled/cancelled.

S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J

A. K. CHAWLA, J JANUARY 30, 2018 /vikas/

ITA 807/2017

Page 2 of 2

More judgments on Section 10A

All 2,147 judgments and leading authorities on Section 10A →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →