THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA)

PDF · subscribers
ITA/301/2018HC KarnatakaKAHC01050703201805 November 2018Bench: RAVI MALIMATH,BELLUNKE A.S3 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the High Court hold?

The High Court accepted the submission of the Revenue's counsel. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as not maintainable.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal before the High Court against an ITAT order. The Revenue's counsel submitted that the appeal was not maintainable due to monetary limits and a CBDT circular.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court based on monetary limits and administrative circulars.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 260-A

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

ON THE 05TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018

BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH

AND

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE

INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.301 OF 2018

BETWEEN:

1.

THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

5TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING

80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA

BENGALURU – 560 095.

2.

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

CIRCLE-11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS

CIRCLE-1(1)(2)

2ND FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING

80 FEET ROAD, KORMANGALA

BENGALURU – 560 095.

… APPELLANTS (BY SRI.ARAVIND K.V., ADVOCATE)

AND:

M/S.BRITISH ENGINES (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED NO.6A, ATTIBELE INDUSTRIES AREA

BENGALURU – 560 085 PAN: AABCB 5956A

…RESPONDENT

THIS APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 06.11.2017 PASSED IN IT(TP)A NO.1454/BANG/2010, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW AND TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN IT(TP)A NO.1454/BANG/2010 DATED 06.11.2017 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE DRP CONFIRMING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BENGALURU AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.

*****

THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants submits that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11.07.2018 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.

2.

In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.

In view of dismissal of the main appeal itself, I.A.No.1 of 2018 for condonation of delay of 3 days in filing the appeal does not arise for consideration.

Sd/- Sd/-

JUDGE JUDGE

Prs*

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →