THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF vs. M/S CHITRADURGA DISTRICT
What did the High Court hold?
The High Court noted the submission by the Revenue's counsel regarding the appeal not being maintainable due to monetary limits and a CBDT circular. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an Income Tax Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was filed for the Assessment Year 2010-2011.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the maintainability of the appeal before the High Court based on monetary limits and administrative circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
ON THE 9TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2018
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.S.BELLUNKE
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.155 OF 2018
BETWEEN:
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX “2ND FLOOR, SHREE TOWERS” NO.565 OF A, A1 OPPOSITE TO DRR HOSTEL HADADI ROAD DAVANAGERE – 577 004.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-1 “2ND FLOOR, SHREE TOWERS NO.565 OF A, A1 OPPOSITE TO DRR HOSTEL HADADI ROAD DAVANAGERE – 577 004. ... APPELLANTS
(BY SRI ARAVIND K.V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
M/S CHITRADURGA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LIMITED
2 CDCC BANK BUILDING CHITRADURGA – 577 501 PAN: AAALC 0069M. ... RESPONDENT
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28.09.2017 PASSED IN ITA NO.1523/BANG/2016, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010- 2011, VIDE ANNEXURE-C PRAYING TO FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE, ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME TAX APPELALTE TRIBUNAL, BENGALURU IN ITA NO.1523/BANG/2016 DATED 28.09.2017 VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND CONFIRM THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER CONFIRMINGTHE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, DAVANGERE AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
*****
THIS INCOME TAX APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellants submit that the appeal is not maintainable in view of the monetary limits and also in terms of Circular No.3 of 2018 dated
3 11.07.2018 passed by Director (ITJ), Central Board Direct Taxes, New Delhi.
In view of the submission made, the appeal is dismissed as such.
SD/-
SD/- JUDGE
JUDGE
*bgn/-
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Surya Prakash Aroma vs. State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 OthersAllahabad · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Govindjee Dairy Milk Private Limited vs. Central Goods And Services TaxRajasthan · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. V J Petro Products vs. The Deputy Assistant Commissioner (St) - IiiAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S Asian Aura vs. Government Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shining Steel Through Its Proprietor Kartik Gupta vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026