SARITA AGARWAL,NAINITAL vs. ACIT CIRCLE 2(1)(1), HALDWANI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 204/DDN/2025Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun19 December 2025AY 2017-18Bench: Sh. Yogesh Kumar US, Judicial Member & Sh. Manish Agarwal (Accountant Member)4 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal observed that the CIT(A) did not decide all grounds of appeal on merits and that the assessee did not participate in the first appellate proceedings. Therefore, the case was restored to the AO for de-novo assessment.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs. 1,06,97,000/- under section 69A read with section 115BBE of the Act, increasing the assessee's income significantly. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) properly adjudicated all grounds of appeal and whether principles of natural justice were followed. The issue of de-novo assessment was also considered.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 147,Section 144B,Section 69A,Section 115BBE

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DEHRADUN BENCH, DEHRADUN

Before: Sh. Yogesh Kumar US & Sh. Manish Agarwal

Hearing: 11.12.2025Pronounced: 19.12.2025

ORDER

Per Yogesh Kumar US, Judicial Member:

1.

The present appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, [‘Ld.

CIT(A)’ for short], Delhi dated 26.06.2025 for the Assessment Year 2017-18.

2.

Brief facts of the case and that, an assessment Order came to be passed on 24.09.2021u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘Act’ for short) by computing the income of the Assessee at Rs. 1,41,56,600/- as against the returned income of Rs.34,59,600/- by making an addition of Rs.1,06,97,000/- u/s 69A r.w.s. 115BBE of the Act. Assessee preferred an Appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) which has been order of the Ld. CIT(A) dated 26.06.2025, Assessee preferred the present Appeal.

3.

The Ld. Counsel for the Assessee submitted that both the order of the A.O. as well as Ld. CIT(A) have not considered the documents and the submissions made by the Assessee and the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided all the grounds of the Appeal of the Assessee and the order impugned came to be passed in violation of principals of natural justice. Thus, sought for allowing the Appeal.

4.

The Ld. Departmental Representative vehemently submitted that the Assessee has not appeared before the ld. CIT(A) even after providing sufficient opportunities. Therefore, the ld. CIT(A) rightly passed the order impugned which requires no interference at the hands of the Tribunal. The Ld. Department's Representative relying on the order of the Ld. CIT(A), sought for dismissal of the Appeal.

5.

We have heard the parties and perused the material available on record. It can be seen from the order of the Ld. CIT(A), the Appeal has been decided Appeal based on the written submission and the report of the A.O. It is further observed that while deciding the Appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has not decided all the grounds of Appeal of the Assessee on its participated in the first Appellate proceedings and the A.O. passed order u/s 147 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, in the interest of justice, we deem it fit to restore the issue to the file of the A.O. for de-novo assessment. Needless to say, the A.O. shall provide opportunity of being heard to the Assessee before passing the assessment order in accordance with law. The Assessee is also directed to participate in assessment proceedings without fail.

6.

In the result, the Appeal of the Assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose.

More judgments on Section 147

All 49,210 judgments and leading authorities on Section 147 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →