Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N. SATYANARAYANA
AND
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE P.G.M. PATIL
I.T.A. No. 100060/2018
BETWEEN
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (CENTRAL), BENGALURU.
DY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRALCIRCLE, SHRADDHA BUILDING, SARAF COLONY, KHANAPUR ROAD, TILAKWADI, BELAGAVI. ... APPELLANTS (By SRI. Y. V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
M/S. STAR PVG EXPORTS, C/O PRASANNA V. GHOTAGE, 202, CHIDAMBAR NAGAR, ANGOL, BELAGAVI 590006. PAN:AAFFS 2661 H. ... RESPONDENT
(By SRI.SANGRAM S. KULKARNI, ADV.)
ITA FILED U/SEC.260A OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO: a. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION OF LAW AS STATED ABOVE. b. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PANAJI BENCH, PANAJI IN IT (SS)A NO.85/PAN/2016, DATED 12.04.2018 AND CONFIRM THE ORDER DATED 21.03.2014 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX OFFICER, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BELAGAVI FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING ON INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, S.N.SATYANARAYANA, J, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal is in challenge to the revenue order granted in favour of the assessee.
The learned counsel for the appellants would bring to the notice of this Court that in the light of recent circular bearing No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019, the present appeal does not survive, in view of the pecuniary limitation prescribed under the aforesaid circular, is in
3 excess of challenge to the order impugned. Hence, he seeks permission to withdraw the appeal filed by the revenue. Memo is accepted. Appellants are permitted to withdraw the appeal.
Accordingly, appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the disposal of the appeal as withdrawn, pending application does not survive for consideration.
SD/- JUDGE
SD/- JUDGE KGK