Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD
I.T.A. NO.76 OF 2013
BETWEEN:
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
BANGALORE-III, BANGALORE.
ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE-12(1), BANGALORE. ... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, ADV.,)
AND:
M/S. M.D. REALTORS PVT. LTD., NO.150, EMBASSY POINT 1ST FLOOR, INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560001. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. CHYTHANYA K.K. ADV.,) - - -
THIS I.T.A. IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T.ACT, 1961, ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 28-09-2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.870/BANG/2011, FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07, PRAYING TO:
I. FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED THEREIN. II. ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE ITAT, BANGALORE BEARING ITA NO.870/BANG/2011 DATED 28-09-2012 AND ORDER OF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, (APPEALS)-III, BANGALORE IN APPEAL NO.ITA NO.199/W-12(1)/CIT(A)-III/BANG/08-09 DATED 30.06.2011.
THIS I.T.A. COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2006-07. The appeal was admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 09.07.2013 on the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in upholding the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in directing the Assessing Officer to allow proportionate deduction under Section 80IB to the extent of profits attributable to the units, where
the built up area is below 1500 sq.ft.?
(ii) Whether in the given facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80IB in respect of profits derived from sale of residential units, wherein the built up area is below 1500 sq.ft. without appreciating the fact that the deduction under Section 80IB is project based rather than unit and there is no concept of proportionate deduction under Section 80IB(10)?
For the reasons assigned by us in the order passed today in ITA No.54/2013, the substantial questions of law are answered against the revenue and in favour of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE