THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LTD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

DATED THIS THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2020

PRESENT

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE

AND

THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD

I.T.A. NO.64/2014 BETWEEN:

... APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K.V. ARAVIND, ADV.,)

AND:

M/S. BRIGADE ENTERPRISES LTD., BRIGADE TOWERS NO.135, BRIGADE TOWERS BANGALORE-560025. ... RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.K. CHYTHANYA, ADV.) - - -

THIS ITA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 260-A OF I.T. ACT, 1961 ARISING OUT OF ORDER DATED 30.08.2013 PASSED IN M.P.NO.42/BANG/2013 IN ITA NO.1356 & 1357/BANG/2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 & 2008-09, PRAYING THAT THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO: (I) FORMULATE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW STATED ABOVE.

(I) ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDERS PASSED BY THE ITAT, BANGALORE MP NO.42/BANG/2013 IN ITA NO.1356 & 1357/BANG/2010 DATED 30-08-2013 CONFIRMING THE ORDER OF THE APPELLATE COMMISSIONER AND CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-11(2), BANGALORE.

THIS ITA COMING ON FOR FURTHER HEARING, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short) has been preferred by the revenue. The subject matter of the appeal pertains to the Assessment year 2008-09. The appeal was admitted by a bench of this Court vide order dated 20.03.2015 on the following substantial questions of law: (i) Whether the Tribunal was right in dismissing miscellaneous petition filed by the revenue without appreciating the fact that the issue involved for Assessment Year 2004-05 was whether certain blocks in the project could be treated s individual and independent projects for the purpose of Section 80IB(10) and the issue involved for

Assessment Year 2007-08 and 2008-09 is whether individual blocks having flats of more than 1500 sq. feet of built up area are eligible for deduction under Section 80IB(10)?

(ii) Whether the Tribunal was right in holding that whenever built up area is more than 1500 sq. feet, the assessee would be entitled to deduction only proportionate to the profits attributable to the residential units which have a built up area of less than 1500 sq. feet and above by violating the provision of Section 80IB(10) of the Act?

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby dismissed.

Sd/- JUDGE

Sd/- JUDGE ss